UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: |
March 31, 2010 |
Or
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from: |
|
to |
|
Commission File Number: |
001-11954 |
|
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
|
22-1657560 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
888 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York |
|
10019 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(212) 894-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
x Large Accelerated Filer |
|
o Accelerated Filer |
o Non-Accelerated Filer (Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
|
o Smaller Reporting Company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of March 31, 2010, 181,913,554 of the registrants common shares of beneficial interest are outstanding.
PART I. |
|
Financial Information: |
Page Number | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements: |
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) as of |
3 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) for the Three Months |
4 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Unaudited) for the Three |
5 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the |
6 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
8 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
31 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition |
32 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
54 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
55 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
PART II. |
|
Other Information: |
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
56 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors |
57 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
57 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
57 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 5. |
Other Information |
57 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Item 6. |
Exhibits |
57 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Signatures |
|
|
58 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Exhibit Index |
|
|
59 | |||||
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
Real estate, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
4,610,165 |
|
$ |
4,606,065 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
13,003,703 |
|
|
12,902,086 |
|
Development costs and construction in progress |
|
|
244,486 |
|
|
313,310 |
|
Leasehold improvements and equipment |
|
|
129,600 |
|
|
128,056 |
|
Total |
|
|
17,987,954 |
|
|
17,949,517 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(2,597,709 |
) |
|
(2,494,441 |
) |
Real estate, net |
|
|
15,390,245 |
|
|
15,455,076 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
788,940 |
|
|
535,479 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
307,849 |
|
|
293,950 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
413,954 |
|
|
380,652 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $50,797 and $46,708 |
|
|
159,805 |
|
|
157,325 |
|
Investments in partially owned entities, including Alexanders of $197,181 and $193,174 |
|
|
839,476 |
|
|
799,832 |
|
Investment in Toys R Us |
|
|
517,497 |
|
|
409,453 |
|
Mezzanine loans receivable, net of allowance of $185,738 and $190,738 |
|
|
126,777 |
|
|
203,286 |
|
Receivable arising from the straight-lining of rents, net of allowance of $5,108 and $4,680 |
|
|
701,733 |
|
|
681,526 |
|
Deferred leasing and financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $201,565 and $183,224 |
|
|
326,743 |
|
|
311,825 |
|
Due from officers |
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
13,150 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
818,492 |
|
|
903,918 |
|
|
|
$ |
20,419,693 |
|
$ |
20,185,472 |
|
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and mortgages payable |
|
$ |
8,432,533 |
|
$ |
8,445,766 |
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
1,224,790 |
|
|
711,716 |
|
Exchangeable senior debentures |
|
|
486,061 |
|
|
484,457 |
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
447,261 |
|
|
445,458 |
|
Revolving credit facility debt |
|
|
500,217 |
|
|
852,218 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
491,464 |
|
|
475,242 |
|
Deferred credit |
|
|
671,366 |
|
|
682,384 |
|
Deferred compensation plan |
|
|
84,028 |
|
|
80,443 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
17,789 |
|
|
17,842 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
100,057 |
|
|
88,912 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
12,455,566 |
|
|
12,284,438 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A units 14,080,613 and 13,892,313 units outstanding |
|
|
1,065,902 |
|
|
971,628 |
|
Series D cumulative redeemable preferred units 10,953,847 and 11,200,000 units outstanding |
|
|
273,846 |
|
|
280,000 |
|
Total redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,339,748 |
|
|
1,251,628 |
|
Vornado shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares of beneficial interest: no par value per share; authorized 110,000,000 |
|
|
823,549 |
|
|
823,686 |
|
Common shares of beneficial interest: $.04 par value per share; authorized, |
|
|
7,247 |
|
|
7,218 |
|
Additional capital |
|
|
6,877,529 |
|
|
6,961,007 |
|
Earnings less than distributions |
|
|
(1,520,690 |
) |
|
(1,577,591 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
29,953 |
|
|
28,449 |
|
Total Vornado shareholders equity |
|
|
6,217,588 |
|
|
6,242,769 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
406,791 |
|
|
406,637 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
6,624,379 |
|
|
6,649,406 |
|
|
|
$ |
20,419,693 |
|
$ |
20,185,472 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
3
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
For The Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property rentals |
|
$ |
560,950 |
|
$ |
549,787 |
|
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
92,921 |
|
|
98,029 |
|
Fee and other income |
|
|
42,460 |
|
|
30,750 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
696,331 |
|
|
678,566 |
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
279,055 |
|
|
278,898 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
135,824 |
|
|
131,656 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
48,730 |
|
|
79,065 |
|
Litigation loss accrual |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
473,665 |
|
|
489,619 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
222,666 |
|
|
188,947 |
|
Income applicable to Alexanders |
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
18,133 |
|
Income applicable to Toys R Us |
|
|
125,870 |
|
|
97,147 |
|
Income (loss) from partially owned entities |
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
(7,543 |
) |
Interest and other investment income, net |
|
|
14,708 |
|
|
14,059 |
|
Interest and debt expense (including amortization of deferred |
|
|
(139,735 |
) |
|
(157,760 |
) |
Net gain on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets other than |
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
|
Net gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
5,905 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
238,158 |
|
|
158,888 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,614 |
) |
|
(5,049 |
) |
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
232,544 |
|
|
153,839 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
Net income |
|
|
232,544 |
|
|
156,431 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, including unit distributions |
|
|
(17,992 |
) |
|
(16,321 |
) |
Net income attributable to Vornado |
|
|
214,552 |
|
|
140,110 |
|
Preferred share dividends |
|
|
(14,267 |
) |
|
(14,269 |
) |
NET INCOME attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
200,285 |
|
$ |
125,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE BASIC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
181,542 |
|
|
155,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE DILUTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
183,445 |
|
|
157,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
4
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
| |||
|
Preferred Shares |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
| |||||||||
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
33,954 |
|
$ |
823,807 |
|
|
155,286 |
|
$ |
6,195 |
|
$ |
6,025,976 |
|
$ |
(1,047,340 |
) |
$ |
(6,899 |
) |
$ |
412,913 |
|
$ |
6,214,652 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
139,647 |
|
Dividends paid on common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
88,453 |
|
|
(147,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,115 |
) |
Dividends paid on preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,269 |
) |
Conversion of Series A preferred shares to |
(2 |
) |
|
(90) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation shares and options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
23,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,290 |
|
Common shares issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon redemption of Class A Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
10,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,946 |
|
Under employees share option plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
505 |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
Change in unrealized net gain or loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(39,305 |
) |
Voluntary surrender of equity awards on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,722 |
|
Adjustments to redeemable Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,856 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
5 |
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(701 |
) |
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
33,952 |
|
$ |
823,717 |
|
|
158,278 |
|
$ |
6,301 |
|
$ |
6,434,715 |
|
$ |
(1,069,607 |
) |
$ |
(46,797 |
) |
$ |
412,450 |
|
$ |
6,560,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
33,952 |
|
$ |
823,686 |
|
|
181,214 |
|
$ |
7,218 |
|
$ |
6,961,007 |
|
$ |
(1,577,591 |
) |
$ |
28,449 |
|
$ |
406,637 |
|
$ |
6,649,406 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
214,765 |
|
Dividends paid on common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,958 |
) |
Dividends paid on preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,267 |
) |
Conversion of Series A preferred |
(2 |
) |
|
(137 |
) |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
Common shares issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon redemption of Class A Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
18,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,128 |
|
Under employees share option plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
541 |
|
|
(25,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,871 |
) |
Under dividend reinvestment plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
Change in unrealized net gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,588 |
|
Our share of partially owned entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(15,688 |
) |
Adjustments to redeemable Class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,247 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
2 |
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
(59 |
) |
|
(513 |
) |
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
33,950 |
|
$ |
823,549 |
|
|
181,914 |
|
$ |
7,247 |
|
$ |
6,877,529 |
|
$ |
(1,520,690 |
) |
$ |
29,953 |
|
$ |
406,791 |
|
$ |
6,624,379 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
5
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
For The Three Months Ended |
| ||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
232,544 |
|
$ |
156,431 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of deferred financing costs) |
|
|
140,250 |
|
|
136,178 |
|
Equity in income of partially owned entities, including Alexanders and Toys R Us |
|
|
(130,812 |
) |
|
(107,737 |
) |
Straight‑lining of rental income |
|
|
(20,922 |
) |
|
(27,138 |
) |
Amortization of below market leases, net |
|
|
(15,907 |
) |
|
(17,982 |
) |
Litigation loss accrual |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
|
Distributions of income from partially owned entities |
|
|
7,123 |
|
|
8,381 |
|
Net gain resulting from Lexington Realty Trusts March 2010 stock issuance |
|
|
(5,998 |
) |
|
|
|
Net gain on dispositions of assets other than depreciable real estate |
|
|
(3,305 |
) |
|
|
|
Other non-cash adjustments |
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
19,522 |
|
Net gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
(5,905 |
) |
Write-off of unamortized costs from the voluntary surrender of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
32,588 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(2,480 |
) |
|
7,469 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
26,137 |
|
|
14,887 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
37,391 |
|
|
(40,320 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
12,123 |
|
|
(6,562 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
288,048 |
|
|
169,812 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received from repayment of mezzanine loans receivable |
|
|
101,839 |
|
|
3,593 |
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate and related investments |
|
|
38,879 |
|
|
20,858 |
|
Development costs and construction in progress |
|
|
(37,598 |
) |
|
(132,529 |
) |
Investments in partially owned entities |
|
|
(36,741 |
) |
|
(9,582 |
) |
Additions to real estate |
|
|
(30,247 |
) |
|
(38,916 |
) |
Investments in mezzanine loans receivable and other |
|
|
(28,873 |
) |
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturing short-term investments |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(13,917 |
) |
|
(9,882 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
(13,899 |
) |
|
(27,298 |
) |
Distributions of capital from partially owned entities |
|
|
7,617 |
|
|
7,504 |
|
Deposits in connection with real estate acquisitions |
|
|
(5,003 |
) |
|
(9 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of, and return of investment in, marketable securities |
|
|
285 |
|
|
7,835 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
7,342 |
|
|
(178,426 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
6
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For The Three Months |
| ||||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| |||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
660,335 |
|
|
353,856 |
|
Repayments of borrowings |
|
|
(525,246 |
) |
|
(138,291 |
) |
Dividends paid on common shares |
|
|
(117,958 |
) |
|
(59,115 |
) |
Repurchase of shares related to stock compensation arrangements and related tax withholdings |
|
|
(24,360 |
) |
|
(32 |
) |
Dividends paid on preferred shares |
|
|
(14,267 |
) |
|
(14,269 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(13,082 |
) |
|
(10,514 |
) |
Purchase of outstanding preferred units |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
(24,330 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(3,351 |
) |
|
(94 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(41,929 |
) |
|
107,211 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
253,461 |
|
|
98,597 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
535,479 |
|
|
1,526,853 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
788,940 |
|
$ |
1,625,450 |
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for interest (including capitalized interest of $614 and $4,569) |
|
$ |
121,573 |
|
$ |
132,208 |
|
Cash payments for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
$ |
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non‑Cash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to redeemable Class A Operating Partnerships units |
|
$ |
(104,247 |
) |
$ |
271,856 |
|
Conversion of Class A Operating Partnership units to common shares, at redemption value |
|
|
18,128 |
|
|
10,946 |
|
Dividends paid in common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
88,563 |
|
Unit distributions paid in Class A units |
|
|
|
|
|
8,213 |
|
Unrealized net gain (loss) on securities available for sale |
|
|
17,588 |
|
|
(39,305 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
7
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Organization
Vornado Realty Trust (Vornado) is a fully‑integrated real estate investment trust (REIT) and conducts its business through Vornado Realty L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the Operating Partnership). Vornado is the sole general partner of, and owned approximately 92.4% of the common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership at March 31, 2010. All references to we, us, our, the Company and Vornado refer to Vornado Realty Trust and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership.
Substantially all of Vornados assets are held through subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. Accordingly, Vornados cash flow and ability to pay dividends to its shareholders is dependent upon the cash flow of the Operating Partnership and the ability of its direct and indirect subsidiaries to first satisfy their obligations to creditors.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and include the accounts of Vornado, and the Operating Partnership and its consolidated partially owned entities. All significant inter-company amounts have been eliminated. In our opinion, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and changes in cash flows have been made. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted. We have made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial sta tements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
On January 21, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, adding new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements and additional disclosures about the activity within Level 3 fair value measurements. The retrospective application of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 810, Consolidation, which modifies the existing quantitative guidance used in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) by requiring entities to qualitatively assess whether an enterprise is a primary beneficiary, based on whether the entity has (i) power over the significant activities of the VIE, and (ii) an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
8
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
4. Investments in Partially Owned Entities
Toys R Us (Toys)
As of March 31, 2010, we own 32.7% of Toys. The business of Toys is highly seasonal. Historically, Toys fourth quarter net income accounts for more than 80% of its fiscal year net income. We account for our investment in Toys under the equity method and record our 32.7% share of Toys net income or loss on a lag basis because Toys fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest January 31, and our fiscal year ends on December 31. As of March 31, 2010, the carrying amount of our investment in Toys does not differ materially from our share of the equity in the net assets of Toys on a purchase accounting basis.
Below is a summary of Toys latest available financial information on a purchase accounting basis:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Balance Sheet: |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
October 31, 2009 |
| ||
Assets |
|
$ |
11,770,000 |
|
$ |
12,589,000 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
10,138,000 |
|
|
11,198,000 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
112,000 |
|
Toys R Us, Inc. equity |
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
1,279,000 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
| ||||
Income Statement: |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
January 31, 2009 |
| ||
Total revenue |
|
$ |
5,857,000 |
|
$ |
5,461,000 |
|
Net income attributable to Toys |
|
|
379,000 |
|
|
291,000 |
|
As of March 31, 2010, we own 32.4% of the outstanding common stock of Alexanders. We manage, lease and develop Alexanders properties pursuant to agreements which expire in March of each year and are automatically renewable. As of March 31, 2010, Alexanders owed us $58,660,000 in fees under these agreements.
Based on Alexanders March 31, 2010 closing share price of $299.13, the market value (fair value pursuant to ASC 820) of our investment in Alexanders is $494,781,000, or $297,600,000 in excess of the March 31, 2010 carrying amount on our consolidated balance sheet. As of March 31, 2010, the carrying amount of our investment in Alexanders, excluding amounts owed to us, exceeds our share of the equity in the net assets of Alexanders by approximately $60,226,000. The majority of this basis difference resulted from the excess of our purchase price for the Alexanders common stock acquired over the book value of Alexanders net assets. Substantially all of this basis difference was allocated, based on our estimates of the fair values of Alexanders assets and liabilities, to their real estate (land and buildi ngs). We are amortizing the basis difference related to the buildings into earnings as additional depreciation expense over their estimated useful lives. This depreciation is not material to our share of equity in Alexanders net income or loss. The basis difference related to the land will be recognized upon disposition of our investment.
Below is a summary of Alexanders latest available financial information:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Balance Sheet: |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 30, 2009 |
| ||
Assets |
|
$ |
1,696,000 |
|
$ |
1,704,000 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
1,366,000 |
|
|
1,389,000 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
328,000 |
|
|
313,000 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
| ||||
Income Statement: |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
| ||
Total revenue |
|
$ |
59,000 |
|
$ |
53,000 |
|
Net income attributable to Alexanders |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
9
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
4. Investments in Partially Owned Entities - continued
Lexington Realty Trust (Lexington) (NYSE: LXP)
As of March 31, 2010, we own 18,468,969 Lexington common shares, or approximately 13.9% of Lexingtons common equity. We account for our investment in Lexington on the equity method because we believe we have the ability to exercise significant influence over Lexingtons operating and financial policies, based on, among other factors, our representation on Lexingtons Board of Trustees and the level of our ownership in Lexington as compared to other shareholders. We record our pro rata share of Lexingtons net income or loss on a one-quarter lag basis because we file our consolidated financial statements on Form 10-K and 10-Q prior to the time that Lexington files its financial statements.
Based on Lexingtons March 31, 2010 closing share price of $6.51, the market value (fair value pursuant to ASC 820) of our investment in Lexington was $120,233,000, or $60,833,000 in excess of the March 31, 2010 carrying amount on our consolidated balance sheet. As of March 31, 2010, the carrying amount of our investment in Lexington was less than our share of the equity in the net assets of Lexington by approximately $63,000,000. This basis difference resulted primarily from $107,882,000 of non-cash impairment charges we recognized during 2008. The remainder of the basis difference related to purchase accounting for our acquisition of an additional 8,000,000 common shares of Lexington in October 2008, of which the majority relates to our estimate of the fair values of Lexingtons real estate (land and buildings) as compared to their carrying amounts in Lexingtons consolidated financial statements. We are amortizing the basis difference related to the buildings into earnings as an adjustment to depreciation expense over their estimated useful lives. This depreciation is not material to our share of equity in Lexingtons net income or loss. The basis difference attributable to the land will be recognized upon disposition of our investment.
Below is a summary of Lexingtons latest available financial information:
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Balance Sheet: |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
| ||
Assets |
|
$ |
3,580,000 |
|
$ |
3,702,000 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
2,283,000 |
|
|
2,344,000 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
94,000 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
1,208,000 |
|
|
1,264,000 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
| ||||
Income Statement: |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
| ||
Total revenue |
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
$ |
99,000 |
|
Net loss attributable to Lexington |
|
|
(46,000 |
) |
|
(14,000 |
) |
10
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
4. Investments in Partially Owned Entities - continued
The carrying amount of our investments in partially owned entities and income (loss) recognized from such investments are as follows:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
Investments: |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
| ||
Toys |
|
$ |
517,497 |
|
$ |
409,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexanders |
|
$ |
197,181 |
|
$ |
193,174 |
|
Partially owned office buildings |
|
|
159,566 |
|
|
158,444 |
|
India real estate ventures |
|
|
125,529 |
|
|
93,322 |
|
Lexington |
|
|
59,400 |
|
|
55,106 |
|
Other equity method investments |
|
|
297,800 |
|
|
299,786 |
|
|
|
$ |
839,476 |
|
$ |
799,832 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
Our Share of Net Income (Loss): |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Toys: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.7% share of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income, before income taxes |
|
$ |
173,550 |
|
$ |
148,385 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(49,710 |
) |
|
(53,091 |
) |
Equity in net income |
|
|
123,840 |
|
|
95,294 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
$ |
125,870 |
|
$ |
97,147 |
|
Alexanders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4% share of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income before stock appreciation rights |
|
$ |
3,777 |
|
$ |
3,855 |
|
Reversal of stock appreciation rights compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
11,105 |
|
Equity in net income |
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
14,960 |
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
2,078 |
|
|
1,893 |
|
Development fees |
|
|
605 |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,460 |
|
$ |
18,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lexington 13.9% share in 2010 and 16.1% share in 2009 of |
|
$ |
6,045 |
(1) |
$ |
(3,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India real estate ventures 4% to 36.5% share of equity in net income (loss) |
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net (2) |
|
|
(2,812 |
) |
|
(4,367 |
) |
|
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
$ |
(7,543 |
) |
_________________________
(1) Includes a $5,998 net gain resulting from Lexingtons March 2010 stock issuance.
(2) Represents equity in net income (loss) of partially owned office buildings in New York and Washington, DC, the Monmouth Mall, Verde Realty Operating Partnership, 85 10th Avenue Associates and others.
11
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
4. Investments in Partially Owned Entities - continued
Below is a summary of the debt of our partially owned entities as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, none of which is recourse to us.
|
|
100% of | ||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, | ||
Toys (32.7% interest) (as of January 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.75% senior unsecured notes, due 2017 (Face value $950,000) |
|
$ |
926,444 |
|
$ |
925,931 |
8.50% senior unsecured notes, due 2017 (Face value $725,000) |
|
|
714,849 |
|
|
|
$2.0 billion credit facility, due 2012, LIBOR plus 1.00% 4.25% |
|
|
|
|
|
418,777 |
$804 million secured term loan facility, due 2012, LIBOR plus 4.25% |
|
|
798,079 |
|
|
797,911 |
Senior U.K. real estate facility, due 2013, with interest at 5.02% |
|
|
561,872 |
|
|
578,982 |
7.625% bonds, due 2011 (Face value $500,000) |
|
|
491,902 |
|
|
490,613 |
7.875% senior notes, due 2013 (Face value $400,000) |
|
|
382,469 |
|
|
381,293 |
7.375% senior notes, due 2018 (Face value $400,000) |
|
|
340,082 |
|
|
338,989 |
4.51% Spanish real estate facility, due 2013 |
|
|
179,835 |
|
|
191,436 |
$181 million unsecured term loan facility, due 2013, LIBOR plus 5.00% |
|
|
180,492 |
|
|
180,456 |
Japan bank loans, due 2011 2014, 1.20% 2.85% |
|
|
172,489 |
|
|
172,902 |
6.84% Junior U.K. real estate facility, due 2013 |
|
|
98,719 |
|
|
101,861 |
4.51% French real estate facility, due 2013 |
|
|
86,755 |
|
|
92,353 |
8.750% debentures, due 2021 (Face value $22,000) |
|
|
21,030 |
|
|
21,022 |
Mortgage loan, due 2010, LIBOR plus 1.30% |
|
|
|
|
|
800,000 |
Japan borrowings, due 2010 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
168,720 |
European and Australian asset-based revolving credit facility, due 2012, |
|
|
|
|
|
102,760 |
Other |
|
|
148,030 |
|
|
136,206 |
|
|
|
5,103,047 |
|
|
5,900,212 |
Alexanders (32.4% interest): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
731 Lexington Avenue mortgage note payable collateralized by the office space, |
|
|
360,170 |
|
|
362,989 |
731 Lexington Avenue mortgage note payable, collateralized by the retail space, |
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
320,000 |
Rego Park construction loan payable, due in December 2010, LIBOR plus 1.20% |
|
|
272,302 |
|
|
266,411 |
Kings Plaza Regional Shopping Center mortgage note payable, due in June 2011, |
|
|
154,651 |
|
|
183,319 |
Rego Park mortgage note payable, due in March 2012 (prepayable without penalty) |
|
|
78,246 |
|
|
78,246 |
Paramus mortgage note payable, due in October 2011, with interest at 5.92% |
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
1,253,369 |
|
|
1,278,965 |
Lexington (13.9% interest) (as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
2,077,849 |
|
|
2,132,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
4. Investments in Partially Owned Entities - continued
|
|
100% of | ||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, | ||
Partially owned office buildings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaempfer Properties (2.5% and 5.0% interests in two partnerships) mortgage notes payable, |
|
$ |
140,989 |
|
$ |
141,547 |
100 Van Ness, San Francisco office complex (9% interest) up to $132 million construction loan payable, |
|
|
85,249 |
|
|
85,249 |
330 Madison Avenue (25% interest) $150,000 mortgage note payable, due in June 2015, LIBOR |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
150,000 |
Fairfax Square (20% interest) mortgage note payable, due in December 2014, with interest at 7.00% |
|
|
72,321 |
|
|
72,500 |
Rosslyn Plaza (46% interest) mortgage note payable, due in December 2011, LIBOR plus 1.0% |
|
|
56,680 |
|
|
56,680 |
West 57th Street (50% interest) mortgage note payable, due in February 2014, with interest at 4.94% |
|
|
23,165 |
|
|
29,000 |
825 Seventh Avenue (50% interest) mortgage note payable, due in October 2014, |
|
|
20,670 |
|
|
20,773 |
India Real Estate Ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCG Urban Infrastructure Holdings (25% interest) mortgage notes payable, collateralized by the |
|
|
184,488 |
|
|
178,553 |
India Property Fund L.P. (36.5% interest) revolving credit facility, repaid upon maturity in |
|
|
|
|
|
77,000 |
Waterfront Associates, LLC (2.5% interest) construction and land loan up to $250 million payable, |
|
|
206,500 |
|
|
183,742 |
Verde Realty Operating Partnership (8.3% interest) mortgage notes payable, |
|
|
607,474 |
|
|
607,089 |
Green Courte Real Estate Partners, LLC (8.3% interest) (as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, |
|
|
302,927 |
|
|
304,481 |
Monmouth Mall (50% interest) mortgage note payable, due in September 2015, with interest |
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
165,000 |
San Jose, California Ground-up Development (45% interest) construction loan, due in March 2013, |
|
|
132,008 |
|
|
132,570 |
Wells/Kinzie Garage (50% interest) mortgage note payable, due in December 2013, with interest at 6.87% |
|
|
14,614 |
|
|
14,657 |
Orleans Hubbard Garage (50% interest) mortgage note payable, due in December 2013, with interest at |
|
|
10,072 |
|
|
10,101 |
Other |
|
|
430,979 |
|
|
425,717 |
Based on our ownership interest in the partially owned entities above, our pro rata share of the debt of these partially owned entities was $2,822,363,000 and $3,149,640,000 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
13
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
5. Marketable Securities
The carrying amount of marketable securities on our consolidated balance sheets and their corresponding fair values at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
| ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
| ||||
Marketable equity securities |
|
$ |
111,023 |
|
$ |
111,023 |
|
$ |
79,925 |
|
$ |
79,925 |
|
Debt securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
302,931 |
|
|
324,946 |
|
|
300,727 |
|
|
319,393 |
|
|
|
$ |
413,954 |
|
$ |
435,969 |
|
$ |
380,652 |
|
$ |
399,318 |
|
At March 31, 2010, aggregate unrealized gains and losses were $30,177,000 and $922,000, respectively. At December 31, 2009, aggregate unrealized gains and losses were $13,026,000 and $1,223,000, respectively.
6. Mezzanine Loans Receivable
The following is a summary of our investments in mezzanine loans as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Carrying Amount as of |
| ||||
Mezzanine Loans Receivable: |
|
Maturity |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
Riley HoldCo Corp. |
|
02/15 |
|
10.00% |
|
$ |
74,437 |
|
$ |
74,437 |
|
Tharaldson Lodging Companies |
|
04/11 |
|
4.47% |
|
|
73,839 |
|
|
74,701 |
|
280 Park Avenue |
|
06/16 |
|
10.25% |
|
|
72,282 |
|
|
73,750 |
|
Equinox |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
97,968 |
|
Other, net |
|
11/11-8/15 |
|
1.35% - 8.95% |
|
|
91,957 |
|
|
73,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,515 |
|
|
394,024 |
|
Valuation allowance (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185,738 |
) |
|
(190,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126,777 |
|
$ |
203,286 |
|
_____________________
(1) In January 2010, Equinox pre-paid the entire balance of this loan which was scheduled to mature in February 2013. We received $99,314, including accrued interest, for our 50% interest in the loan which we acquired in 2006 for $57,500.
(2) Represents loan loss accruals on certain mezzanine loans based on our estimate of the net realizable value of each loan. Our estimates are based on the present value of expected cash flows, discounted at each loans effective interest rate, or if a loan is collateralized, based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, adjusted for estimated costs to sell. The excess of the carrying amount over the net realizable value of a loan is recognized as a reduction of interest and other investment income, net in our consolidated statement of income.
14
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
7. Identified Intangible Assets and Intangible Liabilities
The following summarizes our identified intangible assets (primarily acquired above-market leases) and intangible liabilities (primarily acquired below-market leases) as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
Balance as of |
| ||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
Identified intangible assets (included in other assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amount |
|
$ |
755,075 |
|
$ |
755,467 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(330,693 |
) |
|
(312,957 |
) |
Net |
|
$ |
424,382 |
|
$ |
442,510 |
|
Identified intangible liabilities (included in deferred credit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amount |
|
$ |
942,917 |
|
$ |
942,968 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(327,505 |
) |
|
(309,476 |
) |
Net |
|
$ |
615,412 |
|
$ |
633,492 |
|
Amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of acquired above-market leases resulted in an increase to rental income of $15,907,000 and $17,982,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Estimated annual amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of acquired above-market leases for each of the five succeeding years commencing January 1, 2011 is as follows:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
58,723 |
|
2012 |
|
|
54,430 |
|
2013 |
|
|
46,496 |
|
2014 |
|
|
40,537 |
|
2015 |
|
|
37,686 |
|
Amortization of all other identified intangible assets (a component of depreciation and amortization expense) was $14,914,000 and $15,786,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Estimated annual amortization of all other identified intangible assets including acquired in-place leases, customer relationships, and third party contracts for each of the five succeeding years commencing January 1, 2011 is as follows:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
51,775 |
|
2012 |
|
|
46,446 |
|
2013 |
|
|
38,957 |
|
2014 |
|
|
20,149 |
|
2015 |
|
|
15,043 |
|
We are a tenant under ground leases for certain properties. Amortization of these acquired below-market leases resulted in an increase to rent expense of $509,000 and $533,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Estimated annual amortization of these below-market leases for each of the five succeeding years commencing January 1, 2011 is as follows:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
2,157 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,157 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,157 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,157 |
|
2015 |
|
|
2,157 |
|
15
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
8. Debt
The following is a summary of our debt:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
| ||||
Notes and mortgages payable: |
|
Maturity (1) |
|
Interest Rate at |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
Fixed rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1290 avenue of the Americas |
|
01/13 |
|
5.97% |
|
$ |
431,976 |
|
$ |
434,643 |
|
350 Park Avenue |
|
01/12 |
|
5.48% |
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
430,000 |
|
770 Broadway |
|
03/16 |
|
5.65% |
|
|
353,000 |
|
|
353,000 |
|
888 Seventh Avenue |
|
01/16 |
|
5.71% |
|
|
318,554 |
|
|
318,554 |
|
Two Penn Plaza |
|
02/11 |
|
4.97% |
|
|
281,182 |
|
|
282,492 |
|
909 Third Avenue |
|
04/15 |
|
5.64% |
|
|
209,735 |
|
|
210,660 |
|
Eleven Penn Plaza |
|
12/11 |
|
5.20% |
|
|
202,211 |
|
|
203,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington, DC Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skyline Place |
|
02/17 |
|
5.74% |
|
|
678,000 |
|
|
678,000 |
|
Warner Building |
|
05/16 |
|
6.26% |
|
|
292,700 |
|
|
292,700 |
|
River House Apartments |
|
04/15 |
|
5.43% |
|
|
195,546 |
|
|
195,546 |
|
1215 Clark Street, 200 12th Street and 251 18th Street |
|
01/25 |
|
7.09% |
|
|
112,872 |
|
|
113,267 |
|
Bowen Building |
|
06/16 |
|
6.14% |
|
|
115,022 |
|
|
115,022 |
|
Reston Executive I, II, and III |
|
01/13 |
|
5.57% |
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
93,000 |
|
1101 17th, 1140 Connecticut, 1730 M and 1150 17th Street |
|
08/10 |
|
6.74% |
|
|
85,392 |
|
|
85,910 |
|
1550 and 1750 Crystal Drive |
|
11/14 |
|
7.08% |
|
|
81,235 |
|
|
81,822 |
|
Universal Buildings |
|
04/14 |
|
6.35% |
|
|
105,746 |
|
|
106,630 |
|
1235 Clark Street |
|
07/12 |
|
6.75% |
|
|
53,011 |
|
|
53,252 |
|
2231 Crystal Drive |
|
08/13 |
|
7.08% |
|
|
48,004 |
|
|
48,533 |
|
1750 Pennsylvania Avenue |
|
06/12 |
|
7.26% |
|
|
45,685 |
|
|
45,877 |
|
241 18th Street |
|
10/10 |
|
6.82% |
|
|
45,345 |
|
|
45,609 |
|
2011 Crystal Drive |
|
08/17 |
|
7.30% |
|
|
82,046 |
|
|
82,178 |
|
1225 Clark Street |
|
08/13 |
|
7.08% |
|
|
28,714 |
|
|
28,925 |
|
1800, 1851 and 1901 South Bell Street |
|
12/11 |
|
6.91% |
|
|
17,104 |
|
|
19,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Springfield Mall (including present value of purchase option) (2) |
|
10/12-04/13 |
|
5.45% |
|
|
242,031 |
|
|
242,583 |
|
Montehiedra Town Center |
|
07/16 |
|
6.04% |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
120,000 |
|
Broadway Mall |
|
07/13 |
|
5.33% |
|
|
91,997 |
|
|
92,601 |
|
828-850 Madison Avenue Condominium |
|
06/18 |
|
5.29% |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
80,000 |
|
Las Catalinas Mall |
|
11/13 |
|
6.97% |
|
|
58,923 |
|
|
59,304 |
|
Other (3) |
|
12/10-05/36 |
|
4.75%-12.40% |
|
|
155,955 |
|
|
156,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise Mart: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise Mart |
|
12/16 |
|
5.57% |
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
550,000 |
|
High Point Complex (4) |
|
09/16 |
|
10.35% |
|
|
217,136 |
|
|
217,815 |
|
Boston Design Center |
|
09/15 |
|
5.02% |
|
|
69,378 |
|
|
69,667 |
|
Washington Design Center |
|
11/11 |
|
6.95% |
|
|
44,042 |
|
|
44,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555 California Street |
|
05/10-09/11 |
|
5.94% |
|
|
664,750 |
|
|
664,117 |
|
Industrial Warehouses |
|
10/11 |
|
6.95% |
|
|
24,731 |
|
|
24,813 |
|
Total fixed interest notes and mortgages payable |
|
|
|
6.01% |
|
$ |
6,625,023 |
|
$ |
6,640,012 |
|
___________________
See notes on page 18.
16
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
8. Debt - continued
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
| ||||
Notes and mortgages payable: |
Maturity (1) |
|
Spread over |
|
Interest Rate at |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
Variable rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan Mall |
02/12 |
|
L+55 |
|
0.78% |
|
$ |
232,000 |
|
$ |
232,000 |
|
866 UN Plaza |
05/11 |
|
L+40 |
|
0.65% |
|
|
44,978 |
|
|
44,978 |
|
Washington, DC Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2101 L Street |
02/13 |
|
L+120 |
|
1.45% |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
Courthouse Plaza One and Two |
01/15 |
|
L+75 |
|
0.98% |
|
|
63,666 |
|
|
65,133 |
|
220 20th Street (construction loan) |
01/11 |
|
L+115 |
|
1.40% |
|
|
79,472 |
|
|
75,629 |
|
West End 25 (construction loan) |
02/11 |
|
L+130 |
|
1.55% |
|
|
90,330 |
|
|
85,735 |
|
River House Apartments |
04/18 |
|
(5) |
|
1.60% |
|
|
64,000 |
|
|
64,000 |
|
Retail: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green Acres Mall |
02/13 |
|
L+140 |
|
1.65% |
|
|
335,000 |
|
|
335,000 |
|
Bergen Town Center (construction loan) |
03/13 |
|
L+150 |
|
1.75% |
|
|
261,903 |
|
|
261,903 |
|
Beverly Connection (6) |
07/12 |
|
L+350(6) |
|
5.00% |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
4 Union Square South |
04/14 |
|
L+325 |
|
3.50% |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
435 Seventh Avenue (7) |
08/14 |
|
L+300(7) |
|
5.00% |
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
52,000 |
|
Other |
11/12 |
|
L+375 |
|
3.98% |
|
|
22,987 |
|
|
22,758 |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 Central Park South |
11/10 |
|
L+235 L+245 |
|
2.61% |
|
|
123,750 |
|
|
123,750 |
|
Other (8) |
5/10(8) 11/11 |
|
Various |
|
1.73% - 2.75% |
|
|
112,424 |
|
|
117,868 |
|
Total Variable Interest Notes and Mortgages Payable |
|
|
|
|
1.95% |
|
|
1,807,510 |
|
|
1,805,754 |
|
Total Notes and Mortgages Payable |
|
|
|
|
5.14% |
|
$ |
8,432,533 |
|
$ |
8,445,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes due 2015 (9) |
04/15 |
|
|
|
4.25% |
|
$ |
499,172 |
|
$ |
|
|
Senior unsecured notes due 2039 (10) |
10/39 |
|
|
|
7.88% |
|
|
460,000 |
|
|
446,134 |
|
Senior unsecured notes due 2010 |
12/10 |
|
|
|
4.75% |
|
|
148,267 |
|
|
148,240 |
|
Senior unsecured notes due 2011 |
02/11 |
|
|
|
5.60% |
|
|
117,351 |
|
|
117,342 |
|
Total senior unsecured notes |
|
|
|
|
5.80% |
|
$ |
1,224,790 |
|
$ |
711,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.88% exchangeable senior debentures due 2025 |
04/12 |
|
|
|
5.32% |
|
$ |
486,061 |
|
$ |
484,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior debentures: (see page 19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.85% due 2027 |
04/12 |
|
|
|
5.45% |
|
$ |
21,380 |
|
$ |
21,251 |
|
3.63% due 2026 |
11/11 |
|
|
|
5.32% |
|
|
425,881 |
|
|
424,207 |
|
Total convertible senior debentures |
|
|
|
|
5.33% |
|
$ |
447,261 |
|
$ |
445,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured revolving credit facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1.595 billion unsecured revolving credit facility |
09/12 |
|
L+55 |
|
0.76% |
|
$ |
250,217 |
|
$ |
427,218 |
|
$.965 billion unsecured revolving credit facility |
06/11 |
|
L+55 |
|
0.76% |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
425,000 |
|
Total unsecured revolving credit facilities |
|
|
|
|
0.76% |
|
$ |
500,217 |
|
$ |
852,218 |
|
____________________________
See notes on the following page.
17
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
8. Debt - continued
Notes to preceding tabular information (Amounts in thousands):
(1) Represents the extended maturity for certain loans in which we have the unilateral right, ability and intent to extend. In the case of our convertible and exchangeable debt, represents the earliest date holders may require us to repurchase the debentures.
(2) In the fourth quarter of 2009, we requested that the Springfield Mall mortgage loan with a principal balance of $164,251 be placed with the special servicer. In March 2010, we received notice from the special servicer that the loan was in default. We are in negotiations with the special servicer; there can be no assurance as to the timing and ultimate resolution of these negotiations.
(3) In March 2010, we requested that the mortgage loan on a California retail property with a principal balance of $17,540 be placed with the special servicer. We have not made debt service payments since March and are in default. We are in negotiations with the special servicer; there can be no assurance as to the timing and ultimate resolution of these negotiations.
(4) In March 2010, we requested that the High Point Complex mortgage loan be placed with the special servicer. We have not made debt service payments since March and are in default. We are in negotiations with the special servicer; there can be no assurance as to the timing and ultimate resolution of these negotiations.
(5) This loan bears interest at the Freddie Mac Reference Note Rate plus 1.53%.
(6) This loan has a LIBOR floor of 1.50%.
(7) This loan has a LIBOR floor of 2.00%.
(8) In April 2010, we extended the maturity date of a $59,000 construction loan to May 7, 2010 and are in negotiations to further extend this loan. We are also in negotiations to extend or refinance a loan with an outstanding balance of $36,000, which matured on October 29, 2009.
(9) On March 26, 2010, we completed a public offering of $500,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.25% senior unsecured notes due April 1, 2015. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1, commencing on October 1, 2010. The notes were sold at 99.834% of their face amount to yield 4.287%. The notes can be redeemed without penalty beginning January 1, 2015. We retained net proceeds of approximately $496,000.
(10) These notes may be redeemed at our option in whole or in part beginning on October 1, 2014, at a price equal to the principal amount plus accrued interest. In the quarter ended March 31, 2010, $13,866 of deferred financing costs were reclassified to deferred leasing and financing costs on our consolidated balance sheet.
18
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
8. Debt - continued
Pursuant to the provisions of ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, below is a summary of required disclosures related to our convertible and exchangeable senior debentures.
(Amounts in thousands, except per share |
|
$1.4 Billion Convertible |
|
$1 Billion Convertible |
|
$500 Million Exchangeable |
| ||||||
Balance Sheet: |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
Principal amount of debt component |
$ |
22,479 |
$ |
22,479 |
$ |
437,297 |
$ |
437,297 |
$ |
499,982 |
$ |
499,982 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
(1,099 |
) |
(1,228 |
) |
(11,416 |
) |
(13,090 |
) |
(13,921 |
) |
(15,525 |
) |
Carrying amount of debt component |
$ |
21,380 |
$ |
21,251 |
$ |
425,881 |
$ |
424,207 |
$ |
486,061 |
$ |
484,457 |
|
Carrying amount of equity component |
$ |
2,104 |
$ |
2,104 |
$ |
23,457 |
$ |
23,457 |
$ |
32,301 |
$ |
32,301 |
|
Effective interest rate |
|
5.45 |
% |
5.45 |
% |
5.32 |
% |
5.32 |
% |
5.32 |
% |
5.32 |
% |
Maturity date (period through which |
|
4/1/12 |
|
|
|
11/15/11 |
|
|
|
4/15/12 |
|
|
|
Conversion price per share, as adjusted |
$ |
157.18 |
|
|
$ |
148.46 |
|
|
$ |
87.17 |
|
|
|
Number of shares on which the |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
5,736 |
|
|
|
__________________
(1) Pursuant to the provisions of ASC 470-20, we are required to disclose the conversion price and the number of shares on which the aggregate consideration to be delivered upon conversion is determined (principal plus excess value). Our convertible senior debentures require that upon conversion, the entire principal amount is to be settled in cash, and at our option, any excess value above the principal amount may be settled in cash or common shares. Based on the March 31, 2010 closing share price of our common shares and the conversion prices in the table above, there was no excess value; accordingly, no common shares would be issued if these securities were settled on this date. The number of common shares on which the aggregate consideration that would be delivered upon conversion is 143 and 2,946 common shares, respectively.
(Amounts in thousands) |
For the Three Months Ended |
| |||
Income Statement: |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$1.4 Billion Convertible Senior Debentures: |
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon interest |
$ |
160 |
$ |
9,852 |
|
Discount amortization original issue |
|
23 |
|
1,325 |
|
Discount amortization ASC 470-20 implementation |
|
106 |
|
6,206 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
$ |
17,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1 Billion Convertible Senior Debentures: |
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon interest |
$ |
3,963 |
$ |
8,970 |
|
Discount amortization original issue |
|
455 |
|
976 |
|
Discount amortization ASC 470-20 implementation |
|
1,219 |
|
2,614 |
|
|
$ |
5,637 |
$ |
12,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$500 Million Exchangeable Senior Debentures: |
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon interest |
$ |
4,844 |
$ |
4,844 |
|
Discount amortization original issue |
|
379 |
|
358 |
|
Discount amortization ASC 470-20 implementation |
|
1,225 |
|
1,160 |
|
|
$ |
6,448 |
$ |
6,362 |
|
19
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
9. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets represent Operating Partnership units held by third parties and are comprised of Class A units and Series D-10, D-11, D‑12, D-14 and D-15 (collectively, Series D) cumulative redeemable preferred units. Redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets are recorded at the greater of their carrying amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period. Changes in the value from period to period are charged to additional capital in our consolidated statements of changes in equity. Below is a table summarizing the activity of redeemable noncontrolling interests.
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ |
1,177,978 |
|
Net income |
|
16,821 |
|
Distributions |
|
(18,733 |
) |
Conversion of Class A redeemable units into common shares, at redemption value |
|
(10,946 |
) |
Adjustment to carry Class A redeemable units at redemption value |
|
(271,856 |
) |
Other, net |
|
14,045 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
$ |
907,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ |
1,251,628 |
|
Net income |
|
17,779 |
|
Distributions |
|
(13,082 |
) |
Conversion of Class A redeemable units into common shares, at redemption value |
|
(18,128 |
) |
Adjustment to carry Class A redeemable units at redemption value |
|
104,247 |
|
Redemption of Series D-12 redeemable units |
|
(4,000 |
) |
Other, net |
|
1,304 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ |
1,339,748 |
|
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the aggregate redemption value of our Class A operating partnership units was $1,065,902,000 and $971,628,000, respectively.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests exclude our Series G convertible preferred units and Series D-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units, as they are accounted for as liabilities in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities and Equity, because of their possible settlement by issuing a variable number of Vornado common shares. Accordingly the fair value of these units is included as a component of other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets and aggregated $60,925,000 and $60,271,000 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
On March 5, 2010, we redeemed 246,153 Series D-12 cumulative redeemable preferred units for $16.25 per unit in cash, or $4,000,000 in the aggregate. In connection therewith, we recognized a $2,154,000 net gain which is included as a component of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, including unit distributions, on our consolidated statement of income.
20
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at th e measurement date for assets or liabilities; Level 2 observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and Level 3 unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the fair values we present herein are indicative of amounts that may ultimately be realized upon sale or other disposition of these assets.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in our consolidated financial statements consist primarily of (i) marketable equity securities, (ii) the assets of our deferred compensation plan, which are primarily marketable equity securities and equity investments in limited partnerships, (iii) short-term investments (CDARS classified as available-for-sale) and (iv) mandatorily redeemable instruments (Series G convertible preferred units and Series D-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units). The tables below aggregate the fair values of financial assets and liabilities by the levels in the fair value hierarchy at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
| |||||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| ||||
Marketable equity securities |
$ |
111,023 |
|
$ |
111,023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other assets) |
|
84,028 |
|
|
40,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
43,263 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
15,000 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
$ |
210,051 |
|
$ |
166,788 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
43,263 |
|
Mandatorily redeemable instruments (included in other |
$ |
60,925 |
|
$ |
60,925 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
| |||||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| ||||
Marketable equity securities |
$ |
79,925 |
|
$ |
79,925 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred compensation plan assets (included in other assets) |
|
80,443 |
|
|
40,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
39,589 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
40,000 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
$ |
200,368 |
|
$ |
160,779 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
39,589 |
|
Mandatorily redeemable instruments (included in other |
$ |
60,271 |
|
$ |
60,271 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The fair value of Level 3 deferred compensation plan assets represents equity investments in certain limited partnerships. The following is a summary of changes in these assets for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Beginning |
|
Total Realized/ |
|
Purchases, |
|
Ending |
| ||
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 |
$ |
39,589 |
$ |
1,108 |
|
$ |
2,566 |
|
$ |
43,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value in our consolidated financial statements include mezzanine loans receivable and debt. Estimates of the fair values of these instruments are based on our assessments of available market information and valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analyses. The table below summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of these financial instruments as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
| ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
| ||||
Mezzanine loans receivable |
|
$ |
126,777 |
|
$ |
118,164 |
|
$ |
203,286 |
|
$ |
192,612 |
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and mortgages payable |
|
$ |
8,432,533 |
|
$ |
7,950,328 |
|
$ |
8,445,766 |
|
$ |
7,858,873 |
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
1,224,790 |
|
|
1,235,080 |
|
|
711,716 |
|
|
718,302 |
|
Exchangeable senior debentures |
|
|
486,061 |
|
|
546,855 |
|
|
484,457 |
|
|
547,480 |
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
447,261 |
|
|
463,574 |
|
|
445,458 |
|
|
461,275 |
|
Revolving credit facility debt |
|
|
500,217 |
|
|
500,217 |
|
|
852,218 |
|
|
852,218 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,090,862 |
|
$ |
10,696,054 |
|
$ |
10,939,615 |
|
$ |
10,438,148 |
|
The table below sets forth the combined results of operations of assets related to discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and include the operating results of 1999 K Street, which was sold on September 1, 2009 and 15 other retail properties, which were sold during 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,448 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
856 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,592 |
|
22
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
12. Stock-based Compensation
Our Share Option Plan (the Plan) provides for grants of incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted Operating Partnership units and out-performance plan awards to certain of our employees and officers. We account for all stock-based compensation in accordance ASC 718, Compensation Stock Compensation. Stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 consists of stock option awards, restricted stock awards, Operating Partnership unit awards and out-performance plan awards. In the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recognized $6,477,000 and $10,249,000 of stock-based compensation expense, respectively.
On March 31, 2009, our nine most senior executives voluntarily surrendered their 2007 and 2008 stock option awards and their 2008 out-performance plan awards. Accordingly, we recognized $32,588,000 of expense in the first quarter of 2009 representing the unamortized portion of these awards, which is included as a component of general and administrative expense on our consolidated statement of income.
13. Fee and Other Income
The following table sets forth the details of our fee and other income:
|
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
$ |
13,652 |
|
$ |
14,294 |
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
9,140 |
|
|
2,401 |
|
Lease termination fees |
|
|
6,435 |
|
|
1,624 |
|
Other income |
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
12,431 |
|
|
|
$ |
42,460 |
|
$ |
30,750 |
|
Fee and other income above includes management fee income from Interstate Properties, a related party, of $200,000 and $198,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The above table excludes fee income from partially owned entities, which is included in income from partially owned entities (see Note 4 Investments in Partially Owned Entities).
14. Interest and Other Investment Income, net
The following table sets forth the details of our interest and other investment income:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Dividends and interest on marketable securities |
|
$ |
7,245 |
|
$ |
6,418 |
|
Interest on mezzanine loans |
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
10,324 |
|
Mark-to-market of investments in our deferred compensation plan (1) |
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
(5,794 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
$ |
14,708 |
|
$ |
14,059 |
|
__________________________
(1) This income (loss) is entirely offset by the expense (income) resulting from the mark-to-market of the deferred compensation plan liability, which is included in general and administrative expense.
23
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
15. Income Per Share
The following table provides a reconciliation of both net income and the number of common shares used in the computation of (i) basic income per common share - which utilizes the weighted average number of common shares outstanding without regard to dilutive potential common shares, and (ii) diluted income per common share - which includes the weighted average common shares and potentially dilutive share equivalents. Potentially dilutive share equivalents include our Series A convertible preferred shares, employee stock options, restricted stock and exchangeable senior debentures due 2025.
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
For The Three Months |
| ||||
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
$ |
214,552 |
|
$ |
137,518 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
Net income attributable to Vornado |
|
214,552 |
|
|
140,110 |
|
Preferred share dividends |
|
(14,267 |
) |
|
(14,269 |
) |
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
200,285 |
|
|
125,841 |
|
Earnings allocated to unvested participating securities |
|
(20 |
) |
|
(41 |
) |
Numerator for basic income per share |
|
200,265 |
|
|
125,800 |
|
Impact of assumed conversions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred share dividends |
|
41 |
|
|
43 |
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
$ |
200,306 |
|
$ |
125,843 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic income per share weighted average shares |
|
181,542 |
|
|
155,991 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options and restricted share awards |
|
1,831 |
|
|
1,038 |
|
Convertible preferred shares |
|
72 |
|
|
74 |
|
Denominator for diluted income per share adjusted weighted average shares and |
|
183,445 |
|
|
157,103 |
|
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE BASIC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net |
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Net income per common share |
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE DILUTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net |
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Net income per common share |
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
__________________
(1) The effect of dilutive securities in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 excludes an aggregate of 21,029 and 21,576 weighted average common share equivalents, respectively, as their effect was anti-dilutive.
24
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
16. Comprehensive Income
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For The Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
232,544 |
|
$ |
156,431 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
(39,898 |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
234,048 |
|
|
116,533 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
18,098 |
|
|
12,846 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Vornado |
|
$ |
215,950 |
|
$ |
103,687 |
|
Substantially all of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 relates to income or losses from the mark-to-market of marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale and our share of other comprehensive income or losses of partially owned entities.
17. Retirement Plan
In the first quarter of 2009, we finalized the termination of the Merchandise Mart Properties Pension Plan, which resulted in a $2,800,000 pension settlement expense that is included as a component of general and administrative expense on our consolidated statement of income.
25
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
18. Commitments and Contingencies
Insurance
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and all risk property and rental value insurance with limits of $2.0 billion per occurrence, including coverage for terrorist acts, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods. Our California properties have earthquake insurance with coverage of $150,000,000 per occurrence, subject to a deductible in the amount of 5% of the value of the affected property, upto a $150,000,000 annual aggregate.
Penn Plaza Insurance Company, LLC (PPIC), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a re-insurer with respect to a portion of our earthquake insurance coverage and as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism, including nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (NBCR) acts, as defined by TRIPRA. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to PPIC. Our coverage for NBCR losses is up to $2 billion per occurrence, for which PPIC is responsible for a deductible of $3,200,000 and 15% of the balance of a covered loss and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining 85% of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss borne by PPIC.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years.
Our debt instruments, consisting of mortgage loans secured by our properties which are non-recourse to us, senior unsecured notes, exchangeable senior debentures, convertible senior debentures and revolving credit agreements contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain it could adversely affect our ability to finance and/or refinance our properties and expand our portfolio.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
Our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us. However, in certain cases we have provided guarantees or master leased tenant space. These guarantees and master leases terminate either upon the satisfaction of specified circumstances or repayment of the underlying loans. As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate dollar amount of these guarantees and master leases is approximately $130,646,000.
At March 31, 2010, $30,652,000 of letters of credit were outstanding under one of our revolving credit facilities. Our credit facilities contain financial covenants that require us to maintain minimum interest coverage and maximum debt to market capitalization ratios, and provide for higher interest rates in the event of a decline in our ratings below Baa3/BBB. Our credit facilities also contain customary conditions precedent to borrowing, including representations and warranties and also contain customary events of default that could give rise to accelerated repayment, including such items as failure to pay interest or principal.
Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. The environmental assessments did not reveal any material environmental contamination. However, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites, or changes in cleanup requirements would not result in significant costs to us.
We are committed to fund additional capital to certain of our partially owned entities aggregating approximately $18,360,000.
As part of the process of obtaining the required approvals to demolish and develop our 220 Central Park South property into a new residential tower, we have committed to fund the estimated project cost of approximately $400,000,000 to $425,000,000.
26
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
18. Commitments and Contingencies - continued
Litigation
We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters, including the matters referred to below, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On January 8, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (USDC-NJ) claiming that we had no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $5,000,000 of annual rent from Stop & Shop pursuant to the Master Agreement and Guaranty, because of the expiration of the East Brunswick, Jersey City, Middletown, Union and Woodbridge leases to which the $5,000,000 of additional rent was previously allocated. Stop & Shop asserted that a prior order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York dated February 6, 2001, as modified on appeal to the District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 13, 2001, froze our right to reallocate which effectively terminated our right to collect the additional rent from Stop & Shop. On March 3, 2003, a fter we moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Stop & Shop voluntarily withdrew its complaint. On March 26, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a new complaint in New York State Supreme Court, asserting substantially the same claims as in its USDC-NJ complaint. We removed the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In January 2005 that court remanded the action to the New York State Supreme Court. On February 14, 2005, we served an answer in which we asserted a counterclaim seeking a judgment for all the unpaid additional rent accruing through the date of the judgment and a declaration that Stop & Shop will continue to be liable for the additional rent as long as any of the leases subject to the Master Agreement and Guaranty remain in effect. On May 17, 2005, we filed a motion for summary judgment. On July 15, 2005, Stop & Shop opposed our motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. On December 13, 2005, the Court issued its decision denying the mot ions for summary judgment. Both parties appealed the Courts decision and on December 14, 2006, the Appellate Court division issued a decision affirming the Courts decision. On January 16, 2007, we filed a motion for the reconsideration of one aspect of the Appellate Courts decision which was denied on March 13, 2007. Discovery is now complete. On October 19, 2009, Stop & Shop filed a motion for leave to amend its pleadings to assert new claims for relief, including a claim for damages in an unspecified amount, and an additional affirmative defense. On April 26, 2010, Stop and Shops motion was denied. We anticipate that a trial date will be set for some time in 2010. We intend to continue to vigorously pursue our claims against Stop & Shop. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On May 24, 2007, we acquired a 70% controlling interest in 1290 Avenue of the Americas and the 555 California Street complex. Our 70% interest was acquired through the purchase of all of the shares of a group of foreign companies that own, through U.S. entities, the 1% sole general partnership interest and a 69% limited partnership interest in the partnerships that own the two properties. The remaining 30% limited partnership interest is owned by Donald J. Trump. In August 2005, Mr. Trump brought a lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court against, among others, the general partners of the partnerships referred to above relating to a dispute over the sale of properties located on the former Penn Central rail yards between West 59th and 72nd Streets in Manhattan which were formerly owned by the partnerships. In decisions issu ed in 2006, 2007 and 2009, the New York State Supreme Court dismissed all of Mr. Trumps claims, and those decisions were affirmed by the Appellate Division. Mr. Trump cannot further appeal those decisions. In April 2010, Mr. Trump notified us of his intent to file a new suit claiming, among other things, that the limited partnerships should be dissolved. On April 29, 2010, we filed a motion for declaratory judgment in New York courts seeking to dispose of this claim.
In July 2005, we acquired H Street Building Corporation (H Street) which has a subsidiary that owns, among other things, a 50% tenancy in common interest in land located in Arlington County, Virginia, known as "Pentagon Row," leased to two tenants, Street Retail, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P . In April 2007, H Street acquired the remaining 50% interest in that fee. On September 25, 2008, both tenants filed suit against us and the former owners claiming the right of first offer to purchase the fee interest, damages in excess of $75,000,000 and punitive damages. On April 6, 2010, the Trial Court ruled, in favor of the tenants, that we sell the land to the tenants for a net sales price of $14,992,000, representing the Trial Courts allocation of our purchase price for H Street. The request for damages and punitive da mages was denied. We intend to appeal the Trial Courts decision and expect that the transfer of the land will be stayed pending the appeal. As a result of the Trial Courts decision, we have recorded a $10,056,000 loss accrual in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily representing previously recognized rental income.
27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
19. Segment Information
Below is a summary of net income and a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA(1) by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
| ||||||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
524,121 |
|
$ |
192,604 |
|
$ |
139,880 |
|
$ |
95,764 |
|
$ |
61,444 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
34,429 |
| |||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
6,893 |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
| |||
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
7,422 |
|
|
901 |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
| |||
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
15,907 |
|
|
9,205 |
|
|
732 |
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1,550 |
| |||
Total rentals |
|
|
560,950 |
|
|
209,603 |
|
|
145,266 |
|
|
106,681 |
|
|
62,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
36,580 |
| |||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
92,921 |
|
|
33,252 |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
37,643 |
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,189 |
| |||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
13,652 |
|
|
20,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,766 |
) | |||
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
9,140 |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
8,096 |
|
|
224 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
(651 |
) | |||
Lease termination fees |
|
|
6,435 |
|
|
728 |
|
|
446 |
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other |
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
4,410 |
|
|
5,867 |
|
|
740 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
| |||
Total revenues |
|
|
696,331 |
|
|
269,868 |
|
|
175,425 |
|
|
148,696 |
|
|
70,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
31,568 |
| |||
Operating expenses |
|
|
279,055 |
|
|
115,049 |
|
|
56,663 |
|
|
53,574 |
|
|
39,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,550 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
135,824 |
|
|
43,707 |
|
|
36,683 |
|
|
27,981 |
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,098 |
| |||
General and administrative |
|
|
48,730 |
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
5,897 |
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,019 |
| |||
Litigation loss accrual |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total expenses |
|
|
473,665 |
|
|
163,335 |
|
|
109,299 |
|
|
88,560 |
|
|
59,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
52,667 |
| |||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
222,666 |
|
|
106,533 |
|
|
66,126 |
|
|
60,136 |
|
|
10,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
(21,099 |
) | |||
Income applicable to Alexanders |
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,056 |
| |||
Income applicable to Toys |
|
|
125,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,870 |
|
|
|
| |||
Income (loss) from partially owned entities |
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
1,180 |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,610 |
| |||
Interest and other investment income, net |
|
|
14,708 |
|
|
164 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,499 |
| |||
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(139,735 |
) |
|
(32,686 |
) |
|
(34,484 |
) |
|
(17,899 |
) |
|
(12,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(41,879 |
) | |||
Net gain on dispostion of wholly owned and |
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,509 |
| |||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
238,158 |
|
|
75,314 |
|
|
31,477 |
|
|
43,633 |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
125,870 |
|
|
(37,304 |
) | |||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,614 |
) |
|
(474 |
) |
|
(720 |
) |
|
(35 |
) |
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(4,191 |
) | |||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
232,544 |
|
|
74,840 |
|
|
30,757 |
|
|
43,598 |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
125,870 |
|
|
(41,495 |
) | |||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
(17,992 |
) |
|
(2,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,942 |
) | |||
Net income (loss) attributable to Vornado |
|
|
214,552 |
|
|
72,548 |
|
|
30,757 |
|
|
43,840 |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
125,870 |
|
|
(57,437 |
) | |||
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
196,187 |
|
|
30,992 |
|
|
35,171 |
|
|
19,354 |
|
|
13,009 |
|
|
41,140 |
|
|
56,521 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization(2) |
|
|
186,149 |
|
|
42,074 |
|
|
39,841 |
|
|
28,811 |
|
|
13,482 |
|
|
35,327 |
|
|
26,614 |
| |||
Income tax expense (2) |
|
|
55,706 |
|
|
474 |
|
|
724 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
49,710 |
|
|
4,510 |
| |||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
652,594 |
|
$ |
146,088 |
|
$ |
106,493 |
|
$ |
92,040 |
|
$ |
25,718 |
|
$ |
252,047 |
|
$ |
30,208 |
| |||
_______________________
See notes on page 30.
28
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
19. Segment Information continued
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
| ||||||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
507,083 |
|
$ |
188,762 |
|
$ |
129,374 |
|
$ |
88,150 |
|
$ |
63,001 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
37,796 |
| |||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
13,496 |
|
|
6,715 |
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
| |||
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
11,226 |
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
3,424 |
|
|
6,308 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) | |||
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
17,982 |
|
|
9,923 |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
5,269 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,659 |
| |||
Total rentals |
|
|
549,787 |
|
|
206,940 |
|
|
136,519 |
|
|
103,181 |
|
|
63,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
39,476 |
| |||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
98,029 |
|
|
35,157 |
|
|
18,530 |
|
|
37,068 |
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,955 |
| |||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
14,294 |
|
|
18,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) | |||
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
278 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
(994 |
) | |||
Lease termination fees |
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other |
|
|
12,431 |
|
|
3,527 |
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
459 |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,669 |
| |||
Total revenues |
|
|
678,566 |
|
|
265,055 |
|
|
163,434 |
|
|
140,986 |
|
|
70,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,106 |
| |||
Operating expenses |
|
|
278,898 |
|
|
113,544 |
|
|
56,976 |
|
|
52,780 |
|
|
39,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
16,403 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
131,656 |
|
|
44,110 |
|
|
35,723 |
|
|
23,006 |
|
|
13,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,438 |
| |||
General and administrative |
|
|
79,065 |
|
|
9,162 |
|
|
8,909 |
|
|
11,751 |
|
|
10,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,279 |
| |||
Total expenses |
|
|
489,619 |
|
|
166,816 |
|
|
101,608 |
|
|
87,537 |
|
|
63,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
70,120 |
| |||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
188,947 |
|
|
98,239 |
|
|
61,826 |
|
|
53,449 |
|
|
7,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
(32,014 |
) | |||
Income applicable to Alexanders |
|
|
18,133 |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,792 |
| |||
Income applicable to Toys |
|
|
97,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,147 |
|
|
|
| |||
(Loss) income from partially owned entities |
|
|
(7,543 |
) |
|
1,202 |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
(11,646 |
) | |||
Interest and other investment income, net |
|
|
14,059 |
|
|
282 |
|
|
140 |
|
|
251 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,356 |
| |||
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(157,760 |
) |
|
(33,118 |
) |
|
(30,845 |
) |
|
(22,169 |
) |
|
(12,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(58,792 |
) | |||
Net gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
5,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,136 |
| |||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
158,888 |
|
|
66,797 |
|
|
32,705 |
|
|
33,641 |
|
|
(5,234 |
) |
|
97,147 |
|
|
(66,168 |
) | |||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
(166 |
) |
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(4,207 |
) | |||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
153,839 |
|
|
66,797 |
|
|
32,272 |
|
|
33,475 |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
97,147 |
|
|
(70,375 |
) | |||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
156,431 |
|
|
66,797 |
|
|
34,100 |
|
|
34,239 |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
97,147 |
|
|
(70,375 |
) | |||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
(16,321 |
) |
|
(1,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,562 |
) | |||
Net income (loss) attributable to Vornado |
|
|
140,110 |
|
|
64,920 |
|
|
34,100 |
|
|
34,357 |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
97,147 |
|
|
(84,937 |
) | |||
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
202,177 |
|
|
31,438 |
|
|
31,601 |
|
|
23,059 |
|
|
13,058 |
|
|
35,183 |
|
|
67,838 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization(2) |
|
|
179,590 |
|
|
42,761 |
|
|
37,243 |
|
|
24,070 |
|
|
13,548 |
|
|
35,257 |
|
|
26,711 |
| |||
Income tax expense (2) |
|
|
58,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
166 |
|
|
308 |
|
|
53,091 |
|
|
4,068 |
| |||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
579,944 |
|
$ |
139,119 |
|
$ |
103,378 |
|
$ |
81,652 |
|
$ |
21,437 |
|
$ |
220,678 |
|
$ |
13,680 |
| |||
________________________
See notes on the following page.
29
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
19. Segment Information continued
(1) EBITDA represents Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization. We consider EBITDA a supplemental measure for making decisions and assessing the unlevered performance of our segments as it relates to the total return on assets as opposed to the levered return on equity. As properties are bought and sold based on a multiple of EBITDA, we utilize this measure to make investment decisions as well as to compare the performance of our assets to that of our peers. EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net income. EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
(2) Interest and debt expense, depreciation and amortization and income tax expense in the reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA includes our share of these items from partially owned entities.
(3) Other EBITDA is comprised of:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Lexington |
|
$ |
17,848 |
|
$ |
10,389 |
|
Alexanders |
|
|
14,399 |
|
|
24,399 |
|
555 California Street |
|
|
11,488 |
|
|
11,638 |
|
Industrial warehouses |
|
|
839 |
|
|
1,314 |
|
Hotel Pennsylvania |
|
|
(447 |
) |
|
607 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
11,734 |
|
|
3,947 |
|
|
|
|
55,861 |
|
|
52,294 |
|
Investment income and other (1) |
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
12,482 |
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
(19,388 |
) |
|
(21,468 |
) |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, including unit distributions |
|
|
(15,942 |
) |
|
(14,562 |
) |
Write-off of unamortized costs from the voluntary surrender of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
(20,202 |
) |
Net gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
5,136 |
|
|
|
$ |
30,208 |
|
$ |
13,680 |
|
________________________
(1) The amounts in these captions (for this table only) exclude the mark-to-market of our deferred compensation plan assets and offsetting liability.
30
Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Vornado Realty Trust
New York, New York
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Vornado Realty Trust (the "Company") as of March 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Vornado Realty Trust as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 23, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in method of accounting for debt with conversion options and noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
May 4, 2010
31
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Certain statements contained herein constitute forward‑looking statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They represent our intentions, plans, expectations and beliefs and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our future results, financial condition and business may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as approximates, believes, expects, anticipates, estimates, intends, plans, would, may or other similar expressions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10& #8209;Q. Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of these and our other forward-looking statements are beyond our ability to control or predict. For further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of our forward-looking statements, see Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or the date of any document incorporated by reference. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to re lease publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a discussion of our consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition. There have been no significant changes to our policies during 2010.
32
Overview
Business Objective and Operating Strategy
Our business objective is to maximize shareholder value, which we measure by the total return provided to our shareholders. Below is a table comparing our performance to the Morgan Stanley REIT Index (RMS) and the SNL REIT Index (SNL) for the following periods ending March 31, 2010:
|
|
Total Return (1) |
| ||||
|
|
Vornado |
|
RMS |
|
SNL |
|
One-year |
|
135.0% |
|
110.5% |
|
109.5% |
|
Three-years |
|
(29.6%) |
|
(29.4%) |
|
(26.4%) |
|
Five-years |
|
31.7% |
|
20.3% |
|
24.3% |
|
Ten-years |
|
269.7% |
|
189.2% |
|
205.4% |
|
_________________________
(1) Past performance is not necessarily indicative of how we will perform in the future.
We intend to achieve our business objective by continuing to pursue our investment philosophy and executing our operating strategies through:
· Maintaining a superior team of operating and investment professionals and an entrepreneurial spirit;
· Investing in properties in select markets, such as New York City and Washington, DC, where we believe there
is a high likelihood of capital appreciation;
· Acquiring quality properties at a discount to replacement cost and where there is a significant potential for higher rents;
· Investing in retail properties in select under-stored locations such as the New York City metropolitan area;
· Investing in fully-integrated operating companies that have a significant real estate component; and
· Developing and redeveloping our existing properties to increase returns and maximize value.
We expect to finance our growth, acquisitions and investments using internally generated funds, proceeds from possible asset sales and by accessing the public and private capital markets. We may also offer Vornado common or preferred shares or Operating Partnership units in exchange for property and may repurchase or otherwise reacquire our shares or any other securities in the future.
We may also determine to raise capital for future real estate acquisitions through an institutional investment fund. We would serve as the general partner of the fund and would also expect to be a limited partner of the fund and have the potential to earn certain incentives based on the funds performance. The fund may serve as our exclusive investment vehicle for a limited period of time for all investments that fit within the funds investment parameters. If we determine to raise capital through a fund, the partnership interests offered would not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and could not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration under that act or an applicable exemption from those registration requirements.
We have a large concentration of properties in the New York City metropolitan area and in the Washington, DC and Northern Virginia areas. We compete with a large number of real estate property owners and developers, some of which may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments. Principal factors of competition are rents charged, attractiveness of location, the quality of the property and breadth and quality of services provided. Our success depends upon, among other factors, trends of the national, regional and local economies, financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and customers, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation and population trends. See Risk Factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2 009, for additional information regarding these factors.
The economic recession and illiquidity and volatility in the financial and capital markets during 2008 and 2009 negatively affected substantially all businesses, including ours. Although signs of a recovery in 2010 have emerged, it is not possible for us to quantify the timing and impact of such a recovery, or lack thereof, on our future financial results.
33
Overview - continued
Net income attributable to common shareholders for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $200,285,000, or $1.09 per diluted share, compared to $125,841,000, or $0.80 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 include $307,000 and $173,000, respectively, for our share of net gains on sale of real estate. In addition, net income for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 also include certain items that affect comparability which are listed in the table below. The aggregate of the net gains on sale of real estate and the items in the table below, net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, increased net income attributable to common shareholders for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 by $2,043,000, or $0.01 per diluted share and decreased net income attributable to common shareholders for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 by $15,687,000, or $0.10 per diluted share.
Funds from operations attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions (FFO) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $353,826,000, or $1.87 per diluted share, compared to $268,582,000, or $1.65 per diluted share, for the prior years quarter. FFO for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 include certain items that affect comparability which are listed in the table below. The aggregate of these items, net of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, increased FFO for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 by $1,762,000, or $0.01 per diluted share and decreased FFO for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 by $15,895,000 or $0.10 per diluted share.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Items that affect comparability (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation loss accrual |
|
$ |
10,056 |
|
$ |
|
|
Net gain resulting from Lexingtons March 2010 stock issuance |
|
|
(5,998 |
) |
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of condominiums |
|
|
(2,427 |
) |
|
|
|
Net gain on redemption of perpetual preferred units |
|
|
(2,154 |
) |
|
|
|
Write-off of unamortized costs from the voluntary surrender of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
32,588 |
|
Our share of Alexanders reversal of stock appreciation rights compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(11,105 |
) |
Net gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
(5,905 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(1,373 |
) |
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
|
(1,896 |
) |
|
17,452 |
|
Noncontrolling interests share of above adjustments |
|
|
134 |
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
Items that affect comparability, net |
|
$ |
(1,762 |
) |
$ |
15,895 |
|
The percentage increase (decrease) in GAAP basis and cash basis same store Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) of our operating segments for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 over the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and the trailing quarter ended December 31, 2009 are summarized below.
Same Store EBITDA: |
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
|
March 31, 2010 vs. March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP basis |
|
1.2% |
|
6.4% |
|
3.8% |
|
(6.3%) |
|
Cash basis |
|
2.1% |
|
8.4% |
|
9.7% |
|
(8.7%) |
|
March 31, 2010 vs. December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP basis |
|
(1.9%) (1) |
|
2.6% |
|
(0.7%) (2) |
|
(10.1%) |
|
Cash basis |
|
(1.5%) (1) |
|
3.0% |
|
(1.5%) (2) |
|
(7.4%) |
|
_________________________
(1) Reflects a seasonal increase in utility costs.
(2) Primarily due to rentals from holiday leasing and percentage rents recognized in the fourth quarter.
Calculations of same store EBITDA, reconciliations of net income to EBITDA and FFO and the reasons we consider these non-GAAP financial measures useful are provided in the following pages of Managements Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
34
Overview - continued
The following table sets forth certain information for the properties we own directly or indirectly, including leasing activity. The leasing activity presented below is based on leases signed during the period and is not intended to coincide with the commencement of rental revenue in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Tenant improvements and leasing commissions are presented below based on square feet leased during the period, on a per square foot and per square foot per annum basis, based on weighted average lease terms and as a percentage of initial rent per square foot.
(Square feet in thousands) |
|
|
New York |
|
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise Mart |
| |||
As of March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail(3) |
|
|
Office |
|
|
Showroom |
| ||
Square feet (in service) |
|
|
16,175 |
|
|
18,530 |
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
6,301 |
|
Number of properties |
|
|
28 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
164 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
Occupancy rate |
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
94.4 |
%(2) |
|
91.2 |
% |
|
87.5 |
% |
|
89.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square feet |
|
|
306 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
Initial rent per square foot (1) |
|
$ |
44.83 |
|
$ |
39.83 |
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
24.12 |
|
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Rent per square foot - relet space: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square feet |
|
|
233 |
|
|
237 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
Initial rent cash basis (1) |
|
$ |
47.31 |
|
$ |
40.64 |
|
$ |
10.83 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
24.12 |
|
Prior escalated rent cash basis |
|
$ |
51.55 |
|
$ |
36.68 |
|
$ |
9.64 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
26.34 |
|
Percentage (decrease) increase: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash basis |
|
|
(8.2 |
%) |
|
10.8 |
% |
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
%) |
GAAP basis |
|
|
(8.0 |
%) |
|
16.3 |
% |
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
Rent per square foot vacant space |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square feet |
|
|
73 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial rent (1) |
|
$ |
37.00 |
|
$ |
38.28 |
|
$ |
28.00 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant improvements and leasing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per square foot |
|
$ |
48.65 |
|
$ |
7.80 |
|
$ |
16.27 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
Per square foot per annum |
|
$ |
6.86 |
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
Percentage of initial rent |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
5.1 |
% |
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square feet |
|
|
16,173 |
|
|
18,560 |
|
|
22,553 |
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
6,301 |
|
Number of properties |
|
|
28 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
164 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
Occupancy rate |
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
93.6 |
%(2) |
|
91.6 |
% |
|
88.9 |
% |
|
88.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square feet |
|
|
16,138 |
|
|
17,963 |
|
|
22,224 |
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
6,337 |
|
Number of properties |
|
|
28 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
176 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
Occupancy rate |
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
94.6 |
%(2) |
|
92.0 |
% |
|
95.1 |
% |
|
90.1 |
% |
_______________________________
(1) Most leases include periodic step-ups in rent, which are not reflected in the initial rent per square foot leased.
(2) Excluding residential and other properties, occupancy rates for office properties were 94.9%, 94.9% and 95.2% at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
(3) Mall sales per square foot, including partially owned malls, for the trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $466 and $488, respectively.
35
Overview - continued
On March 26, 2010, we completed a public offering of $500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.25% senior unsecured notes due April 1, 2015. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1, commencing on October 1, 2010. The notes were sold at 99.834% of their face amount to yield 4.287%. The notes can be redeemed without penalty beginning January 1, 2015. We retained net proceeds of approximately $496,000,000.
On January 21, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, adding new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements and additional disclosures about the activity within Level 3 fair value measurements. The retrospective application of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 810, Consolidation, which modifies the existing quantitative guidance used in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) by requiring entities to qualitatively assess whether an enterprise is a primary beneficiary, based on whether the entity has (i) power over the significant activities of the VIE, and (ii) an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
36
Net Income and EBITDA by Segment for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Below is a summary of net income and a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA(1) by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
| ||||||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
524,121 |
|
$ |
192,604 |
|
$ |
139,880 |
|
$ |
95,764 |
|
$ |
61,444 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
34,429 |
| |||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
6,893 |
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
| |||
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
7,422 |
|
|
901 |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
| |||
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
15,907 |
|
|
9,205 |
|
|
732 |
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1,550 |
| |||
Total rentals |
|
|
560,950 |
|
|
209,603 |
|
|
145,266 |
|
|
106,681 |
|
|
62,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
36,580 |
| |||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
92,921 |
|
|
33,252 |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
37,643 |
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,189 |
| |||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
13,652 |
|
|
20,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,766 |
) | |||
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
9,140 |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
8,096 |
|
|
224 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
(651 |
) | |||
Lease termination fees |
|
|
6,435 |
|
|
728 |
|
|
446 |
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other |
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
4,410 |
|
|
5,867 |
|
|
740 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
| |||
Total revenues |
|
|
696,331 |
|
|
269,868 |
|
|
175,425 |
|
|
148,696 |
|
|
70,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
31,568 |
| |||
Operating expenses |
|
|
279,055 |
|
|
115,049 |
|
|
56,663 |
|
|
53,574 |
|
|
39,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,550 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
135,824 |
|
|
43,707 |
|
|
36,683 |
|
|
27,981 |
|
|
13,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,098 |
| |||
General and administrative |
|
|
48,730 |
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
5,897 |
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,019 |
| |||
Litigation loss accrual |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total expenses |
|
|
473,665 |
|
|
163,335 |
|
|
109,299 |
|
|
88,560 |
|
|
59,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
52,667 |
| |||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
222,666 |
|
|
106,533 |
|
|
66,126 |
|
|
60,136 |
|
|
10,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
(21,099 |
) | |||
Income applicable to Alexanders |
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,056 |
| |||
Income applicable to Toys |
|
|
125,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,870 |
|
|
|
| |||
Income (loss) from partially owned entities |
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
1,180 |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,610 |
| |||
Interest and other investment income, net |
|
|
14,708 |
|
|
164 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,499 |
| |||
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(139,735 |
) |
|
(32,686 |
) |
|
(34,484 |
) |
|
(17,899 |
) |
|
(12,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(41,879 |
) | |||
Net gain on dispostion of wholly owned and |
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,509 |
| |||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
238,158 |
|
|
75,314 |
|
|
31,477 |
|
|
43,633 |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
125,870 |
|
|
(37,304 |
) | |||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,614 |
) |
|
(474 |
) |
|
(720 |
) |
|
(35 |
) |
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(4,191 |
) | |||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
232,544 |
|
|
74,840 |
|
|
30,757 |
|
|
43,598 |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
125,870 |
|
|
(41,495 |
) | |||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
(17,992 |
) |
|
(2,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,942 |
) | |||
Net income (loss) attributable to Vornado |
|
|
214,552 |
|
|
72,548 |
|
|
30,757 |
|
|
43,840 |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
125,870 |
|
|
(57,437 |
) | |||
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
196,187 |
|
|
30,992 |
|
|
35,171 |
|
|
19,354 |
|
|
13,009 |
|
|
41,140 |
|
|
56,521 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization(2) |
|
|
186,149 |
|
|
42,074 |
|
|
39,841 |
|
|
28,811 |
|
|
13,482 |
|
|
35,327 |
|
|
26,614 |
| |||
Income tax expense (2) |
|
|
55,706 |
|
|
474 |
|
|
724 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
49,710 |
|
|
4,510 |
| |||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
652,594 |
|
$ |
146,088 |
|
$ |
106,493 |
|
$ |
92,040 |
|
$ |
25,718 |
|
$ |
252,047 |
|
$ |
30,208 |
| |||
___________________
See notes on page 39.
37
Net Income and EBITDA by Segment for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 continued
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
|
Toys |
|
Other (3) |
| ||||||||||
Property rentals |
|
$ |
507,083 |
|
$ |
188,762 |
|
$ |
129,374 |
|
$ |
88,150 |
|
$ |
63,001 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
37,796 |
| |||
Straight-line rents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Contractual rent increases |
|
|
13,496 |
|
|
6,715 |
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
| |||
Amortization of free rent |
|
|
11,226 |
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
3,424 |
|
|
6,308 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) | |||
Amortization of acquired below- |
|
|
17,982 |
|
|
9,923 |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
5,269 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,659 |
| |||
Total rentals |
|
|
549,787 |
|
|
206,940 |
|
|
136,519 |
|
|
103,181 |
|
|
63,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
39,476 |
| |||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
98,029 |
|
|
35,157 |
|
|
18,530 |
|
|
37,068 |
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,955 |
| |||
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Tenant cleaning fees |
|
|
14,294 |
|
|
18,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) | |||
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
278 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
(994 |
) | |||
Lease termination fees |
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other |
|
|
12,431 |
|
|
3,527 |
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
459 |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,669 |
| |||
Total revenues |
|
|
678,566 |
|
|
265,055 |
|
|
163,434 |
|
|
140,986 |
|
|
70,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,106 |
| |||
Operating expenses |
|
|
278,898 |
|
|
113,544 |
|
|
56,976 |
|
|
52,780 |
|
|
39,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
16,403 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
131,656 |
|
|
44,110 |
|
|
35,723 |
|
|
23,006 |
|
|
13,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,438 |
| |||
General and administrative |
|
|
79,065 |
|
|
9,162 |
|
|
8,909 |
|
|
11,751 |
|
|
10,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,279 |
| |||
Total expenses |
|
|
489,619 |
|
|
166,816 |
|
|
101,608 |
|
|
87,537 |
|
|
63,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
70,120 |
| |||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
188,947 |
|
|
98,239 |
|
|
61,826 |
|
|
53,449 |
|
|
7,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
(32,014 |
) | |||
Income applicable to Alexanders |
|
|
18,133 |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,792 |
| |||
Income applicable to Toys |
|
|
97,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,147 |
|
|
|
| |||
(Loss) income from partially owned entities |
|
|
(7,543 |
) |
|
1,202 |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
(11,646 |
) | |||
Interest and other investment income, net |
|
|
14,059 |
|
|
282 |
|
|
140 |
|
|
251 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,356 |
| |||
Interest and debt expense |
|
|
(157,760 |
) |
|
(33,118 |
) |
|
(30,845 |
) |
|
(22,169 |
) |
|
(12,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(58,792 |
) | |||
Net gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
5,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,136 |
| |||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
158,888 |
|
|
66,797 |
|
|
32,705 |
|
|
33,641 |
|
|
(5,234 |
) |
|
97,147 |
|
|
(66,168 |
) | |||
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
(166 |
) |
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(4,207 |
) | |||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
153,839 |
|
|
66,797 |
|
|
32,272 |
|
|
33,475 |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
97,147 |
|
|
(70,375 |
) | |||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
156,431 |
|
|
66,797 |
|
|
34,100 |
|
|
34,239 |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
97,147 |
|
|
(70,375 |
) | |||
Net (income) loss attributable to |
|
|
(16,321 |
) |
|
(1,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,562 |
) | |||
Net income (loss) attributable to Vornado |
|
|
140,110 |
|
|
64,920 |
|
|
34,100 |
|
|
34,357 |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
97,147 |
|
|
(84,937 |
) | |||
Interest and debt expense (2) |
|
|
202,177 |
|
|
31,438 |
|
|
31,601 |
|
|
23,059 |
|
|
13,058 |
|
|
35,183 |
|
|
67,838 |
| |||
Depreciation and amortization(2) |
|
|
179,590 |
|
|
42,761 |
|
|
37,243 |
|
|
24,070 |
|
|
13,548 |
|
|
35,257 |
|
|
26,711 |
| |||
Income tax expense (2) |
|
|
58,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
166 |
|
|
308 |
|
|
53,091 |
|
|
4,068 |
| |||
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
579,944 |
|
$ |
139,119 |
|
$ |
103,378 |
|
$ |
81,652 |
|
$ |
21,437 |
|
$ |
220,678 |
|
$ |
13,680 |
| |||
______________________________
See notes on following page.
38
Net Income and EBITDA by Segment for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 - continued
Notes to preceding tabular information:
(1) EBITDA represents Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization. We consider EBITDA a supplemental measure for making decisions and assessing the unlevered performance of our segments as it relates to the total return on assets as opposed to the levered return on equity. As properties are bought and sold based on a multiple of EBITDA, we utilize this measure to make investment decisions as well as to compare the performance of our assets to that of our peers. EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net income. EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
(2) Interest and debt expense, depreciation and amortization and income tax expense in the reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA includes our share of these items from partially owned entities.
(3) Other EBITDA is comprised of:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Lexington |
|
$ |
17,848 |
|
$ |
10,389 |
|
Alexanders |
|
|
14,399 |
|
|
24,399 |
|
555 California Street |
|
|
11,488 |
|
|
11,638 |
|
Industrial warehouses |
|
|
839 |
|
|
1,314 |
|
Hotel Pennsylvania |
|
|
(447 |
) |
|
607 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
11,734 |
|
|
3,947 |
|
|
|
|
55,861 |
|
|
52,294 |
|
Investment income and other (1) |
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
12,482 |
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
(19,388 |
) |
|
(21,468 |
) |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, including unit distributions |
|
|
(15,942 |
) |
|
(14,562 |
) |
Write-off of unamortized costs from the voluntary surrender of equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
(20,202 |
) |
Net gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
5,136 |
|
|
|
$ |
30,208 |
|
$ |
13,680 |
|
________________________
(1) The amounts in these captions (for this table only) exclude the mark-to-market of our deferred compensation plan assets and offsetting liability.
39
Our revenues, which consist of property rentals, tenant expense reimbursements, hotel revenues, trade shows revenues, amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of above-market leases and fee income, were $696,331,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared to $678,566,000 in the prior years quarter, an increase of $17,765,000. Below are the details of the increase (decrease) by segment:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Increase (decrease) due to: |
|
Total |
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
|
Other |
| ||||||
Property rentals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and other |
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
905 |
|
$ |
2,064 |
|
$ |
(1,048 |
) |
Development/redevelopment |
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired below-market |
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
(718 |
) |
|
(370 |
) |
|
(728 |
) |
|
(150 |
) |
|
(109 |
) |
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel Pennsylvania |
|
|
(1,424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,424 |
)(1) |
Trade shows |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
|
Leasing activity (see page 35) |
|
|
10,494 |
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
7,348 |
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
(2,426 |
) |
|
(315 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in property rentals |
|
|
11,163 |
|
|
2,663 |
|
|
8,747 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
(2,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant expense reimbursements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions/development |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
Operations |
|
|
(5,126 |
) |
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
(2,701 |
) |
|
229 |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
483 |
|
(Decrease) increase in tenant expense reimbursements |
|
|
(5,108 |
) |
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
(2,780 |
) |
|
575 |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease cancellation fee income |
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
686 |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
3,408 |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
|
Management and leasing fees |
|
|
6,739 |
|
|
362 |
|
|
6,131 |
(2) |
|
(54 |
) |
|
(43 |
) |
|
343 |
|
BMS cleaning fees |
|
|
880 |
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,766 |
)(3) |
Other |
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
(639 |
) |
|
429 |
|
|
281 |
|
|
662 |
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in fee and other income |
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
4,055 |
|
|
6,024 |
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
1,872 |
|
|
(3,876 |
) |
Total increase (decrease) in revenues |
|
$ |
17,765 |
|
$ |
4,813 |
|
$ |
11,991 |
|
$ |
7,710 |
|
$ |
(211 |
) |
$ |
(6,538 |
) |
______________________________
(1) Primarily due to lower REVPAR.
(2) Primarily from leasing fees in connection with our management of a development project.
(3) Primarily from the elimination of inter-company fees from operating segments upon consolidation. See note (2) on page 41.
40
Our expenses, which consist of operating, depreciation and amortization and general and administrative expenses, were $473,665,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared to $489,619,000 in the prior years quarter, a decrease of $15,954,000. Below are the details of the (decrease) increase by segment:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) due to: |
|
Total |
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
|
Other |
|
| |||||||||
Operating: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Acquisitions and other |
|
$ |
227 |
|
$ |
(1,522 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
$ |
1,770 |
|
$ |
(696 |
) | ||||
Development/redevelopment |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Hotel activity |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611 |
| ||||
Trade shows activity |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
| ||||
Operations |
|
|
(2,174 |
) |
|
3,027 |
(1) |
|
(1,712 |
) |
|
(265 |
) |
|
(1,456 |
) |
|
(1,768 |
)(2) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in operating expenses |
|
|
157 |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
794 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
(1,853 |
) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Acquisitions/development |
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
(607 |
) | ||||
Operations (due to additions to buildings |
|
|
2,223 |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
(515 |
) |
|
3,898 |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
(733 |
) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in depreciation and |
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
960 |
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
(1,340 |
) | ||||
General and administrative: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Write-off of unamortized costs from the |
|
|
(32,588 |
) |
|
(3,451 |
) |
|
(3,131 |
) |
|
(4,793 |
) |
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
(20,202 |
) | ||||
Mark-to-market of deferred compensation plan liability (4) |
|
|
8,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,557 |
| ||||
Operations |
|
|
(6,304 |
) |
|
(1,132 |
) |
|
119 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
(2,723 |
)(5) |
|
(2,615 |
) (6) | ||||
Decrease in general and |
|
|
(30,335 |
) |
|
(4,583 |
) |
|
(3,012 |
) |
|
(4,746 |
) |
|
(3,734 |
) |
|
(14,260 |
) | ||||
Litigation loss accrual (7) |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total (decrease) increase in expenses |
|
$ |
(15,954 |
) |
$ |
(3,481 |
) |
$ |
7,691 |
|
$ |
1,023 |
|
$ |
(3,734 |
) |
$ |
(17,453 |
) | ||||
______________________________
(1) Results from a $3,616 increase in BMS operating expenses and a $1,098 increase in non-reimbursable operating expenses, partially offset by a $1,687 decrease in reimbursable operating expenses.
(2) Primarily from the elimination of inter-company fees from operating segments upon consolidation.
(3) On March 31, 2009, our nine most senior executives voluntarily surrendered their 2007 and 2008 stock option awards and their 2008 out-performance plan awards. Accordingly, we recognized $32,588 of expense in the first quarter of 2009, representing the unamortized portion of these awards.
(4) This increase in expense is entirely offset by a corresponding increase in income from the mark-to-market of the deferred compensation plan assets, a component of interest and other investment income on our consolidated statements of income.
(5) Primarily due to $2,800 of pension plan termination costs in 2009.
(6) Primarily from lower stock-based compensation as a result of the voluntary surrender of equity awards on March 31, 2009. Stock-based compensation awards granted in March 2010 will result in an increase in expense in subsequent quarters of approximately $1,650 per quarter ($2,900 including our operating segments) over the prior years comparable amounts.
(7) For additional information, see page 52.
41
Our 32.4% share of Alexanders net income (comprised of our share of Alexanders net income, management, leasing, and development fees) was $6,460,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $18,133,000 for the prior years first quarter, a decrease of $11,673,000. This decrease was primarily due to $11,105,000 of income for our share of the reversal of accrued stock appreciation rights compensation expense in the prior years quarter.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we recognized $125,870,000 of income from our investment in Toys, comprised of $123,840,000 for our 32.7% share of Toys net income ($173,550,000 before our share of Toys income tax expense) and $2,030,000 of interest and other income.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we recognized $97,147,000 of income from our investment in Toys, comprised of $95,294,000 for our 32.7% share of Toys net income ($148,385,000 before our share of Toys income tax expense) and $1,853,000 of interest and other income.
Summarized below are the components of loss from partially owned entities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For The Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Equity in Net Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Lexington 13.9% in 2010 and 16.1% share in 2009 of equity in net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,045 |
(1) |
$ |
(3,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India real estate ventures 4% to 36.5% share of equity in net income (loss) |
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net (2) |
|
|
(2,812 |
) |
|
(4,367 |
) |
|
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
$ |
(7,543 |
) |
________________________
(1) Includes a $5,998 net gain resulting from Lexingtons March 2010 stock issuance.
(2) Represents equity in net loss of partially owned office buildings in New York and Washington, DC, the Monmouth Mall, Verde Realty Operating Partnership, 85 10th Avenue Associates and others.
42
Interest and other investment income, net (comprised of interest income on mezzanine loans receivable, other interest income and dividend income) was $14,708,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $14,059,000 in the prior years quarter, an increase of $649,000. This increase resulted from:
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in the value of investments in our deferred compensation plan (offset by |
|
$ |
8,557 |
|
Lower average mezzanine loan investments ($148,852 in this quarter compared to $472,864 in the |
|
|
(7,609 |
) |
Lower average yield on investments (0.2% in this quarter compared to 0.6% in the prior |
|
|
(1,126 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
$ |
649 |
|
Interest and debt expense was $139,735,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $157,760,000 in the prior years quarter, a decrease of $18,025,000. This decrease resulted primarily from savings of $27,881,000 as a result of the acquisition, repayment and retirement of an aggregate of $2.1 billion of our convertible senior debentures and senior unsecured notes, partially offset by $9,056,000 of interest expense from the issuance of $460,000,000 of senior unsecured notes in September 2009.
Net gain on disposition of wholly owned and partially owned assets other than depreciable real estate was $3,305,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and was primarily comprised of net gains on sale of condominiums at our 40 East 66th Street property.
Net gain on early extinguishment of debt was $5,905,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and resulted primarily from the acquisition and retirement of $81,534,000 of our senior unsecured notes.
Income tax expense was $5,614,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $5,049,000 in the prior years quarter, an increase of $565,000. This increase resulted primarily from higher income at 1290 Avenue of the Americas and 555 California Street, which are subject to federal withholding taxes on dividends paid to foreign corporations.
43
The table below sets forth the combined results of operations of assets related to discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and include the operating results of 1999 K Street, which was sold on September 1, 2009 and 15 other retail properties, which were sold during 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
For the Three Months |
| ||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,448 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
856 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,592 |
|
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests, Including Unit Distributions
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is comprised of (i) allocations of income to redeemable noncontrolling interests of $15,215,000 and $12,002,000, respectively, (ii) net income and net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries of $213,000 and $500,000, respectively, (iii) preferred unit distributions of the Operating Partnership of $4,718,000 and $4,819,000, respectively and (iv) a net of a net gain of $2,154,000 on the redemption of a portion of the Series D-12 perpetual preferred units in the current period. The increase of $3,213,000 in allocations of income to redeemable noncontrolling interests resulted primarily from higher net income subject to allocation to unitholders.
Preferred share dividends were $14,267,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $14,269,000 for the prior years quarter.
44
Same store EBITDA represents EBITDA from property level operations which are owned by us in both the current and prior year reporting periods. Same store EBITDA excludes segment-level overhead expenses, which are expenses that we do not consider to be property-level expenses, as well as other non-operating items. We present same store EBITDA on both a GAAP basis and a cash basis, which excludes income from the straight-lining of rents, amortization of below-market leases, net of above-market leases and other non-cash adjustments. We present these non-GAAP measures to (i) facilitate meaningful comparisons of the operational performance of our properties and segments, (ii) make decisions on whether to buy, sell or refinance properties, and (iii) compare the performance of our properties and segments to those of our peers. Same store EBITDA should not be consid ered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
Below are the same store EBITDA results on a GAAP and cash basis for each of our segments for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
| ||||
EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2010 |
$ |
146,088 |
|
$ |
106,493 |
|
$ |
92,040 |
|
$ |
25,718 |
|
Add-back: non-property level overhead |
|
4,579 |
|
|
5,897 |
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
7,230 |
|
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions, dispositions |
|
(624 |
) |
|
3,221 |
|
|
(7,137 |
) |
|
(3,724 |
) |
GAAP basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
|
150,043 |
|
|
115,611 |
|
|
91,908 |
|
|
29,224 |
|
Less: Adjustments for straight-line rents, |
|
(15,608 |
) |
|
(4,917 |
) |
|
(9,391 |
) |
|
(1,376 |
) |
Cash basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
$ |
134,435 |
|
$ |
110,694 |
|
$ |
82,517 |
|
$ |
27,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2009 |
$ |
139,119 |
|
$ |
103,378 |
|
$ |
81,652 |
|
$ |
21,437 |
|
Add-back: non-property level overhead |
|
9,162 |
|
|
8,909 |
|
|
11,751 |
|
|
10,964 |
|
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions, dispositions |
|
(10 |
) |
|
(3,602 |
) |
|
(4,837 |
) |
|
(1,228 |
) |
GAAP basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
|
148,271 |
|
|
108,685 |
|
|
88,566 |
|
|
31,173 |
|
Less: Adjustments for straight-line rents, |
|
(16,580 |
) |
|
(6,608 |
) |
|
(13,365 |
) |
|
(670 |
) |
Cash basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
$ |
131,691 |
|
$ |
102,077 |
|
$ |
75,201 |
|
$ |
30,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in GAAP basis same store EBITDA for |
|
1,772 |
|
$ |
6,926 |
|
$ |
3,342 |
|
$ |
(1,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in Cash basis same store EBITDA for the |
|
2,744 |
|
$ |
8,617 |
|
$ |
7,316 |
|
$ |
(2,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% increase (decrease) in GAAP basis same store EBITDA |
|
1.2% |
|
|
6.4% |
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
(6.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% increase (decrease) in Cash basis same store EBITDA |
|
2.1% |
|
|
8.4% |
|
|
9.7% |
|
|
(8.7%) |
|
45
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Our revenues and expenses are subject to seasonality during the year which impacts quarterly net earnings, cash flows and funds from operations, and therefore impacts comparisons of the current quarter to the previous quarter. The business of Toys is highly seasonal. Historically, Toys fourth quarter net income, which we record on a one-quarter lag basis in our first quarter, accounts for more than 80% of Toys fiscal year net income. The Office and Merchandise Mart segments have historically experienced higher utility costs in the first and third quarters of the year. The Merchandise Mart segment also has experienced higher earnings in the second and fourth quarters of the year due to major trade shows occurring in those quarters. The Retail segment revenue in the fourth quarter is typically higher due to the recognition of percentage rental income. Below ar e the same store EBITDA results on a GAAP and cash basis for each of our segments for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
| ||||
EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2010 |
$ |
146,088 |
|
$ |
106,493 |
|
$ |
92,040 |
|
$ |
25,718 |
|
Add-back: non-property level overhead |
|
4,579 |
|
|
5,897 |
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
7,230 |
|
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions, dispositions |
|
(624 |
) |
|
3,221 |
|
|
(6,677 |
) |
|
(3,724 |
) |
GAAP basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
|
150,043 |
|
|
115,611 |
|
|
92,368 |
|
|
29,224 |
|
Less: Adjustments for straight-line rents, amortization |
|
(15,608 |
) |
|
(4,917 |
) |
|
(9,362 |
) |
|
(1,376 |
) |
Cash basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
$ |
134,435 |
|
$ |
110,694 |
|
$ |
83,006 |
|
$ |
27,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA for the three months ended December 31, 2009 (1) |
$ |
149,052 |
|
$ |
110,243 |
|
$ |
71,699 |
|
$ |
25,810 |
|
Add-back: non-property level overhead |
|
4,232 |
|
|
5,671 |
|
|
5,487 |
|
|
6,495 |
|
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions, dispositions |
|
(296 |
) |
|
(3,197 |
) |
|
15,871 |
|
|
191 |
|
GAAP basis same store EBITDA for the three months |
|
152,988 |
|
|
112,717 |
|
|
93,057 |
|
|
32,496 |
|
Less: Adjustments for straight-line rents, amortization |
|
(16,443 |
) |
|
(5,294 |
) |
|
(8,817 |
) |
|
(2,433 |
) |
Cash basis same store EBITDA for the three |
$ |
136,545 |
|
$ |
107,423 |
|
$ |
84,240 |
|
$ |
30,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in GAAP basis same store EBITDA for |
|
(2,945 |
) |
$ |
2,894 |
|
$ |
(689 |
) |
$ |
(3,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in Cash basis same store EBITDA for the |
|
(2,110 |
) |
$ |
3,271 |
|
$ |
(1,234 |
) |
$ |
(2,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% (decrease) increase in GAAP basis same store EBITDA |
|
(1.9%) |
|
|
2.6% |
|
|
(0.7%) |
|
|
(10.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% (decrease) increase in Cash basis same store EBITDA |
|
(1.5%) |
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
(1.5%) |
|
|
(7.4%) |
|
________________________
(1) Below is a reconciliation of our net income (loss) to EBITDA for the three months ended December 31, 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
| ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Vornado for the three months |
$ |
73,969 |
|
$ |
31,619 |
|
$ |
20,023 |
|
$ |
(3,376 |
) |
Interest and debt expense |
|
31,910 |
|
|
35,792 |
|
|
24,494 |
|
|
13,299 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
42,686 |
|
|
42,484 |
|
|
27,179 |
|
|
15,499 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
487 |
|
|
348 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
388 |
|
EBITDA for the three months ended December 31, 2009 |
$ |
149,052 |
|
$ |
110,243 |
|
$ |
71,699 |
|
$ |
25,810 |
|
46
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We anticipate that cash flow from continuing operations over the next twelve months will be adequate to fund our business operations, cash distributions to unitholders of the Operating Partnership, cash dividends to shareholders, debt amortization and recurring capital expenditures. Capital requirements for significant acquisitions and development expenditures may require funding from borrowings and/or equity offerings. We may from time to time purchase or retire outstanding debt securities. Such purchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements and other factors. The amounts involved in connection with these transactions could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
We may also determine to raise capital for future real estate acquisitions through an institutional investment fund. We would serve as the general partner of the fund and would also expect to be a limited partner of the fund and have the potential to earn certain incentives based on the funds performance. The fund may serve as our exclusive investment vehicle for a limited period of time for all investments that fit within the funds investment parameters. If we determine to raise capital through a fund, the partnership interests offered would not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and could not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration under that act or an applicable exemption from those registration requirements.
Property rental income is our primary source of cash flow and is dependent upon the occupancy and rental rates of our properties. Other sources of liquidity to fund cash requirements include proceeds from debt financings, including mortgage loans, senior unsecured borrowings, and our revolving credit facilities; proceeds from the issuance of common and preferred equity; and asset sales. Our cash requirements include property operating expenses, capital improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, distributions to common and preferred shareholders, as well as acquisition and development costs. Our cash and cash equivalents were $788,940,000 at March 31, 2010, a $253,461,000 increase over the balance at December 31, 2009. This increase resulted from $288,048,000 of net cash provided by operating activities and $7,342,000 of net cash prov ided by investing activities, partially offset by, $41,929,000 of net cash used in financing activities.
Our consolidated outstanding debt was $11,090,862,000 at March 31, 2010, a $151,247,000 increase over the balance at December 31, 2009. This increase was primarily due to the public offering of $500,000,000 of 4.25% senior unsecured notes in March 2010, partially offset by net repayments of $352,001,000 under our revolving credit facilities. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $500,217,000 and $852,218,000 respectively, was outstanding under our revolving credit facilities. During the remainder of 2010 and 2011, $532,138,000 and $2,278,715,000 of our outstanding debt matures, respectively. We may refinance such debt or choose to repay all or a portion, using existing cash balances or our revolving credit facilities.
Our share of debt of unconsolidated subsidiaries was $2,822,363,000 at March 31, 2010, a $327,277,000 decrease from the balance at December 31, 2009.
Cash flows provided by operating activities of $288,048,000 was primarily comprised of (i) net income of $232,544,000, net of $24,790,000 of non-cash adjustments, including depreciation and amortization expense, the effect of straight-lining of rental income, equity in net income of partially owned entities, (ii) distributions of income from partially owned entities of $7,123,000, and (iii) the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $73,171,000.
Net cash provided by investing activities of $7,342,000 was primarily comprised of (i) proceeds received from repayment of mezzanine loans receivable of $101,839,000, (ii) proceeds from the sale of real estate and related investments of $38,879,000, (iii) proceeds from maturing short-term investments of $25,000,000 and (iv) distributions of capital from partially owned entities of $7,617,000, partially offset by (v) development and redevelopment expenditures of $37,598,000, (vi) investments in partially owned entities of $36,741,000, (vii) additions to real estate of $30,247,000, (viii) investments in mezzanine loans receivable and other of $28,873,000, (ix) purchases of marketable equity securities of $13,917,000, (x) restricted cash of $13,899,000 and (xi) deposits in connection with real estate acquisitions of $5,003,000.
Net cash used in financing activities of $41,929,000 was primarily comprised of (i) proceeds from borrowings of $660,335,000, partially offset by, (ii) repayments of borrowings, including the purchase of our senior unsecured notes, of $525,246,000, (iii) dividends paid on common shares of $117,958,000, (iv) repurchase of shares related to stock compensation arrangements and related tax withholdings of $24,360,000, (v) dividends paid on preferred shares of $14,267,000 and (vii) distributions to noncontrolling interests of $13,082,000.
47
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Our capital expenditures consist of expenditures to maintain assets, tenant improvement allowances and leasing commissions. Recurring capital improvements include expenditures to maintain a propertys competitive position within the market and tenant improvements and leasing commissions necessary to re-lease expiring leases or renew or extend existing leases. Non-recurring capital improvements include expenditures completed in the year of acquisition and the following two years that were planned at the time of acquisition as well as tenant improvements and leasing commissions for space that was vacant at the time of acquisition of a property. Our development and redevelopment expenditures include all hard and soft costs associated with the development or redevelopment of a property, including tenant improvements, leasing commissions, capitalized interes t and operating costs until the property is substantially complete and ready for its intended use.
Below are the details of capital expenditures, leasing commissions and development and redevelopment expenditures and a reconciliation of total expenditures on an accrual basis to the cash expended in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
New York |
|
|
Washington, DC |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
Other |
|
Capital Expenditures (accrual basis): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures to maintain assets |
|
$ |
7,784 |
|
$ |
4,505 |
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
$ |
383 |
|
$ |
614 |
|
$ |
1,164 |
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
19,673 |
|
|
11,686 |
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
|
Leasing commissions |
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
795 |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Non-recurring capital expenditures |
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
Total capital expenditures and leasing |
|
|
32,443 |
|
|
19,412 |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
1,525 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile to cash basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures in the current year applicable to prior periods |
|
|
26,340 |
|
|
16,928 |
|
|
4,174 |
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
821 |
|
|
1,490 |
|
Expenditures to be made in future |
|
|
(20,884 |
) |
|
(11,017 |
) |
|
(2,361 |
) |
|
(4,553 |
) |
|
(1,355 |
) |
|
(1,598 |
) |
Total capital expenditures and leasing commissions (cash basis) |
|
$ |
37,899 |
|
$ |
25,323 |
|
$ |
5,717 |
|
$ |
3,310 |
|
$ |
2,132 |
|
$ |
1,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant improvements and leasing commissions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per square foot per annum |
|
$ |
3.14 |
|
$ |
6.86 |
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
$ |
|
|
Percentage of initial rent |
|
|
9.8% |
|
|
15.3% |
|
|
5.1% |
|
|
10.6% |
|
|
3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and Redevelopment Expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West End 25 |
|
$ |
4,521 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4,521 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
1540 Broadway |
|
|
4,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bergen Town Center |
|
|
4,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 20th Street |
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasserman Venture |
|
|
2,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,982 |
|
North Bergen, New Jersey |
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poughkeepsie, New York |
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverly Connection |
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garfield, New Jersey |
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
11,192 |
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
321 |
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
$ |
37,598 |
|
$ |
1,899 |
|
$ |
12,702 |
|
$ |
16,733 |
|
$ |
321 |
|
$ |
5,943 |
|
48
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Our cash and cash equivalents were $1,625,450,000 at March 31, 2009, a $98,597,000 increase over the balance at December 31, 2008. This increase resulted from $169,812,000 of net cash provided by operating activities and $107,211,000 of net cash provided by financing activities, partially offset by $178,426,000 of net cash used in investing activities.
Our consolidated outstanding debt was $12,731,830,000 at March 31, 2009, a $220,160,000 increase over the balance at December 31, 2008. This increase resulted primarily from $300,000,000 of draws under our revolving credit facilities during the first quarter, partially offset by the $81,534,000 purchase of our senior unsecured notes and $47,000,000 of repayments on our cross-collateralized retail mortgage. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $658,468,000 and $358,468,000 respectively, was outstanding under our revolving credit facilities.
Our share of debt of unconsolidated subsidiaries was $2,999,693,000 at March 31, 2009, a $196,892,000 decrease from the balance at December 31, 2008.
Cash flows provided by operating activities of $169,812,000 was primarily comprised of (i) net income of $156,431,000, (ii) $29,526,000 of non-cash adjustments (including depreciation and amortization expense, the effect of straight-lining of rental income and equity in net income of partially owned entities), (iii) distributions of income from partially owned entities of $8,381,000, partially offset by (iv) the net change in operating assets and liabilities of $24,526,000.
Net cash used in investing activities of $178,426,000 was primarily comprised of (i) development and redevelopment expenditures of $132,529,000, (ii) additions to real estate of $38,916,000, (iii) restricted cash of $27,298,000, (iv) investments in partially owned entities of $9,582,000 and (v) purchases of marketable equity securities of $9,882,000, partially offset by (vi) proceeds from the sale of real estate of $20,858,000, (vii) proceeds from the sale of marketable equity securities of $7,835,000 and (viii) distributions of capital from partially owned entities of $7,504,000.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $107,211,000 was primarily comprised of (i) proceeds from borrowings of $353,856,000, partially offset by, (ii) repayments of borrowings, including the purchase of our senior unsecured notes, of $138,291,000, (iii) dividends paid on common shares of $59,115,000, (iv) distributions to noncontrolling interests of $10,514,000 and (v) dividends paid on preferred shares of $14,269,000.
49
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Below are the details of capital expenditures, leasing commissions and development and redevelopment expenditures and a reconciliation of total expenditures on an accrual basis to the cash expended in the three months ended March 31, 2009.
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
New York |
|
Washington, DC |
|
Retail |
|
Merchandise |
|
Other |
| ||||||
Capital Expenditures (accrual basis): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures to maintain assets |
|
$ |
8,625 |
|
$ |
4,555 |
|
$ |
2,044 |
|
$ |
73 |
|
$ |
1,953 |
|
$ |
|
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
9,121 |
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
455 |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
|
Leasing commissions |
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
983 |
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-recurring capital expenditures |
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
Total capital expenditures and leasing |
|
|
25,211 |
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
11,313 |
|
|
721 |
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
1,828 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile to cash basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures in the current year applicable to prior periods |
|
|
29,631 |
|
|
12,953 |
|
|
12,818 |
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Expenditures to be made in future |
|
|
(10,566 |
) |
|
(2,843 |
) |
|
(7,006 |
) |
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
Total capital expenditures and leasing commissions (cash basis) |
|
$ |
44,276 |
|
$ |
18,891 |
|
$ |
17,125 |
|
$ |
1,903 |
|
$ |
4,723 |
|
$ |
1,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant improvements and leasing commissions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per square foot per annum |
|
$ |
2.58 |
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
$ |
3.69 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
$ |
|
|
Percentage of initial rent |
|
|
7.4% |
|
|
6.3% |
|
|
9.2% |
|
|
2.7% |
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and Redevelopment Expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bergen Town Center |
|
$ |
25,477 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
25,477 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
West End 25 |
|
|
19,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasserman venture |
|
|
17,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,993 |
|
2101 L Street |
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan Mall |
|
|
11,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 K Street |
|
|
8,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Bergen, New Jersey |
|
|
6,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poughkeepsie, New York |
|
|
6,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 20th Street |
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
18,625 |
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
3,747 |
|
|
5,780 |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
5,671 |
|
|
|
$ |
132,529 |
|
$ |
1,955 |
|
$ |
49,406 |
|
$ |
56,032 |
|
$ |
1,472 |
|
$ |
23,664 |
|
50
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Insurance
We maintain general liability insurance with limits of $300,000,000 per occurrence and all risk property and rental value insurance with limits of $2.0 billion per occurrence, including coverage for terrorist acts, with sub-limits for certain perils such as floods. Our California properties have earthquake insurance with coverage of $150,000,000 per occurrence, subject to a deductible in the amount of 5% of the value of the affected property, up to a $150,000,000 annual aggregate.
Penn Plaza Insurance Company, LLC (PPIC), our wholly owned consolidated subsidiary, acts as a re-insurer with respect to a portion of our earthquake insurance coverage and as a direct insurer for coverage for acts of terrorism, including nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (NBCR) acts, as defined by TRIPRA. Coverage for acts of terrorism (excluding NBCR acts) is fully reinsured by third party insurance companies and the Federal government with no exposure to PPIC. Our coverage for NBCR losses is up to $2 billion per occurrence, for which PPIC is responsible for a deductible of $3,200,000 and 15% of the balance of a covered loss and the Federal government is responsible for the remaining 85% of a covered loss. We are ultimately responsible for any loss borne by PPIC.
We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism. However, we cannot anticipate what coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years.
Our debt instruments, consisting of mortgage loans secured by our properties which are non-recourse to us, senior unsecured notes, exchangeable senior debentures, convertible senior debentures and revolving credit agreements contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we have adequate insurance coverage for purposes of these agreements, we may not be able to obtain an equivalent amount of coverage at reasonable costs in the future. Further, if lenders insist on greater coverage than we are able to obtain it could adversely affect our ability to finance and/or refinance our properties and expand our portfolio.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
Our mortgage loans are non-recourse to us. However, in certain cases we have provided guarantees or master leased tenant space. These guarantees and master leases terminate either upon the satisfaction of specified circumstances or repayment of the underlying loans. As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate dollar amount of these guarantees and master leases is approximately $130,646,000.
At March 31, 2010, $30,652,000 of letters of credit were outstanding under one of our revolving credit facilities. Our credit facilities contain financial covenants that require us to maintain minimum interest coverage and maximum debt to market capitalization ratios, and provide for higher interest rates in the event of a decline in our ratings below Baa3/BBB. Our credit facilities also contain customary conditions precedent to borrowing, including representations and warranties and also contain customary events of default that could give rise to accelerated repayment, including such items as failure to pay interest or principal.
Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. The environmental assessments did not reveal any material environmental contamination. However, there can be no assurance that the identification of new areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, the discovery of additional sites, or changes in cleanup requirements would not result in significant costs to us.
We are committed to fund additional capital to certain of our partially owned entities aggregating approximately $18,360,000.
As part of the process of obtaining the required approvals to demolish and develop our 220 Central Park South property into a new residential tower, we have committed to fund the estimated project cost of approximately $400,000,000 to $425,000,000.
51
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - continued
Litigation
We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters, including the matters referred to below, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On January 8, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (USDC-NJ) claiming that we had no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $5,000,000 of annual rent from Stop & Shop pursuant to the Master Agreement and Guaranty, because of the expiration of the East Brunswick, Jersey City, Middletown, Union and Woodbridge leases to which the $5,000,000 of additional rent was previously allocated. Stop & Shop asserted that a prior order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York dated February 6, 2001, as modified on appeal to the District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 13, 2001, froze our right to reallocate which effectively terminated our right to collect the additional rent from Stop & Shop. On March 3, 2003, a fter we moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Stop & Shop voluntarily withdrew its complaint. On March 26, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a new complaint in New York State Supreme Court, asserting substantially the same claims as in its USDC-NJ complaint. We removed the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In January 2005 that court remanded the action to the New York State Supreme Court. On February 14, 2005, we served an answer in which we asserted a counterclaim seeking a judgment for all the unpaid additional rent accruing through the date of the judgment and a declaration that Stop & Shop will continue to be liable for the additional rent as long as any of the leases subject to the Master Agreement and Guaranty remain in effect. On May 17, 2005, we filed a motion for summary judgment. On July 15, 2005, Stop & Shop opposed our motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. On December 13, 2005, the Court issued its decision denying the mot ions for summary judgment. Both parties appealed the Courts decision and on December 14, 2006, the Appellate Court division issued a decision affirming the Courts decision. On January 16, 2007, we filed a motion for the reconsideration of one aspect of the Appellate Courts decision which was denied on March 13, 2007. Discovery is now complete. On October 19, 2009, Stop & Shop filed a motion for leave to amend its pleadings to assert new claims for relief, including a claim for damages in an unspecified amount, and an additional affirmative defense. On April 26, 2010, Stop and Shops motion was denied. We anticipate that a trial date will be set for some time in 2010. We intend to continue to vigorously pursue our claims against Stop & Shop. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On May 24, 2007, we acquired a 70% controlling interest in 1290 Avenue of the Americas and the 555 California Street complex. Our 70% interest was acquired through the purchase of all of the shares of a group of foreign companies that own, through U.S. entities, the 1% sole general partnership interest and a 69% limited partnership interest in the partnerships that own the two properties. The remaining 30% limited partnership interest is owned by Donald J. Trump. In August 2005, Mr. Trump brought a lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court against, among others, the general partners of the partnerships referred to above relating to a dispute over the sale of properties located on the former Penn Central rail yards between West 59th and 72nd Streets in Manhattan which were formerly owned by the partnerships. In decisions issu ed in 2006, 2007 and 2009, the New York State Supreme Court dismissed all of Mr. Trumps claims, and those decisions were affirmed by the Appellate Division. Mr. Trump cannot further appeal those decisions. In April 2010, Mr. Trump notified us of his intent to file a new suit claiming, among other things, that the limited partnerships should be dissolved. On April 29, 2010, we filed a motion for declaratory judgment in New York courts seeking to dispose of this claim.
In July 2005, we acquired H Street Building Corporation (H Street) which has a subsidiary that owns, among other things, a 50% tenancy in common interest in land located in Arlington County, Virginia, known as "Pentagon Row," leased to two tenants, Street Retail, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P . In April 2007, H Street acquired the remaining 50% interest in that fee. On September 25, 2008, both tenants filed suit against us and the former owners claiming the right of first offer to purchase the fee interest, damages in excess of $75,000,000 and punitive damages. On April 6, 2010, the Trial Court ruled, in favor of the tenants, that we sell the land to the tenants for a net sales price of $14,992,000, representing the Trial Courts allocation of our purchase price for H Street. The request for damages and punitive da mages was denied. We intend to appeal the Trial Courts decision and expect that the transfer of the land will be stayed pending the appeal. As a result of the Trial Courts decision, we have recorded a $10,056,000 loss accrual in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily representing previously recognized rental income.
52
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (FFO)
FFO is computed in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT). NAREIT defines FFO as GAAP net income or loss adjusted to exclude net gains from sales of depreciated real estate assets, depreciation and amortization expense from real estate assets, extraordinary items and other specified non-cash items, including the pro rata share of such adjustments of unconsolidated subsidiaries. FFO and FFO per diluted share are used by management, investors and analysts to facilitate meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods and among our peers because it excludes the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization and net gains on sales, which are based on historical costs and implicitly assume that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over ti me, rather than fluctuating based on existing market conditions. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash requirements and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a performance measure or cash flow as a liquidity measure. FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. The calculations of both the numerator and denominator used in the computation of income per share are disclosed in footnote 15 Income Per Share, in the notes to our consolidated financial statements on page 24 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions was $353,826,000, or $1.87 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $268,582,000, or $1.65 per diluted share for the prior years quarter. Details of certain items that affect comparability are discussed in the financial results summary of our Overview.
(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts) |
|
For The Three Months |
| ||||
Reconciliation of our Net Income to FFO: |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
| ||
Net income attributable to Vornado |
|
$ |
214,552 |
|
$ |
140,110 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of real property |
|
|
127,614 |
|
|
124,127 |
|
Proportionate share of adjustments to equity in net income of Toys to arrive at FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of real property |
|
|
17,501 |
|
|
16,580 |
|
Income tax effect of Toys adjustments included above |
|
|
(6,125 |
) |
|
(5,803 |
) |
Proportionate share of adjustments to equity in net income of partially owned entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of real property |
|
|
19,541 |
|
|
14,608 |
|
Net gains on sale of real estate |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
(173 |
) |
Noncontrolling interests share of above adjustments |
|
|
(11,171 |
) |
|
(13,003 |
) |
FFO |
|
|
361,605 |
|
|
276,446 |
|
Preferred share dividends |
|
|
(14,267 |
) |
|
(14,269 |
) |
FFO attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
347,338 |
|
|
262,177 |
|
Interest on 3.875% exchangeable senior debentures |
|
|
6,447 |
|
|
6,362 |
|
Convertible preferred dividends |
|
|
41 |
|
|
43 |
|
FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions |
|
$ |
353,826 |
|
$ |
268,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Weighted Average Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
181,542 |
|
|
155,991 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.875% exchangeable senior debentures |
|
|
5,736 |
|
|
5,669 |
|
Employee stock options and restricted share awards |
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
1,038 |
|
Convertible preferred shares |
|
|
72 |
|
|
74 |
|
Denominator for diluted FFO per share |
|
|
189,181 |
|
|
162,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to common shareholders plus assumed conversions per diluted share |
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
We have exposure to fluctuations in market interest rates. Market interest rates are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control. Our exposure to a change in interest rates on our consolidated and non-consolidated debt (all of which arises out of non-trading activity) is as follows:
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
As at March 31, 2010 |
|
As at December 31, 2009 | |||||||||
Consolidated debt: |
Balance |
|
Weighted |
|
Effect of 1% |
|
|
|
Weighted | |||
Variable rate |
$ |
2,307,727 |
|
1.69% |
|
$ |
23,077 |
|
$ |
2,657,972 |
|
1.67% |
Fixed rate |
|
8,783,135 |
|
5.91% |
|
|
|
|
|
8,281,643 |
|
5.89% |
|
$ |
11,090,862 |
|
5.03% |
|
|
23,077 |
|
$ |
10,939,615 |
|
4.86% |
Pro-rata share of debt of non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate excluding Toys |
$ |
300,900 |
|
2.84% |
|
|
3,009 |
|
$ |
331,980 |
|
2.87% |
Variable rate Toys |
|
368,512 |
|
5.14% |
|
|
3,685 |
|
|
852,040 |
|
3.45% |
Fixed rate (including $1,300,695, and |
|
2,152,951 |
|
7.33% |
|
|
|
|
|
1,965,620 |
|
7.16% |
|
$ |
2,822,363 |
|
6.57% |
|
|
6,694 |
|
$ |
3,149,640 |
|
5.70% |
Redeemable noncontrolling interests share of above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total change in annual net income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
Per share-diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
We may utilize various financial instruments to mitigate the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our cash flows and earnings, including hedging strategies, depending on our analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies. As of March 31, 2010, variable rate debt with an aggregate principal amount of $507,750,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 2.49% was subject to LIBOR caps. These caps are based on a notional amount of $507,750,000 and cap LIBOR at a weighted average rate of 5.39%.
The estimated fair value of our debt at March 31, 2010 was less than its aggregate carrying amount by approximately $394,808,000, based on current market prices and discounted cash flows at the current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for the remaining term of such debt.
54
Disclosure Controls and Procedures: The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a‑15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
55
We are from time to time involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters, including the matters referred to below, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On January 8, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (USDC-NJ) claiming that we had no right to reallocate and therefore continue to collect the $5,000,000 of annual rent from Stop & Shop pursuant to the Master Agreement and Guaranty, because of the expiration of the East Brunswick, Jersey City, Middletown, Union and Woodbridge leases to which the $5,000,000 of additional rent was previously allocated. Stop & Shop asserted that a prior order of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York dated February 6, 2001, as modified on appeal to the District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 13, 2001, froze our right to reallocate which effectively terminated our right to collect the additional rent from Stop & Shop. On March 3, 2003, a fter we moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Stop & Shop voluntarily withdrew its complaint. On March 26, 2003, Stop & Shop filed a new complaint in New York State Supreme Court, asserting substantially the same claims as in its USDC-NJ complaint. We removed the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In January 2005 that court remanded the action to the New York State Supreme Court. On February 14, 2005, we served an answer in which we asserted a counterclaim seeking a judgment for all the unpaid additional rent accruing through the date of the judgment and a declaration that Stop & Shop will continue to be liable for the additional rent as long as any of the leases subject to the Master Agreement and Guaranty remain in effect. On May 17, 2005, we filed a motion for summary judgment. On July 15, 2005, Stop & Shop opposed our motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. On December 13, 2005, the Court issued its decision denying the mot ions for summary judgment. Both parties appealed the Courts decision and on December 14, 2006, the Appellate Court division issued a decision affirming the Courts decision. On January 16, 2007, we filed a motion for the reconsideration of one aspect of the Appellate Courts decision which was denied on March 13, 2007. Discovery is now complete. On October 19, 2009, Stop & Shop filed a motion for leave to amend its pleadings to assert new claims for relief, including a claim for damages in an unspecified amount, and an additional affirmative defense. On April 26, 2010, Stop and Shops motion was denied. We anticipate that a trial date will be set for some time in 2010. We intend to continue to vigorously pursue our claims against Stop & Shop. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On May 24, 2007, we acquired a 70% controlling interest in 1290 Avenue of the Americas and the 555 California Street complex. Our 70% interest was acquired through the purchase of all of the shares of a group of foreign companies that own, through U.S. entities, the 1% sole general partnership interest and a 69% limited partnership interest in the partnerships that own the two properties. The remaining 30% limited partnership interest is owned by Donald J. Trump. In August 2005, Mr. Trump brought a lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court against, among others, the general partners of the partnerships referred to above relating to a dispute over the sale of properties located on the former Penn Central rail yards between West 59th and 72nd Streets in Manhattan which were formerly owned by the partnerships. In decisions issu ed in 2006, 2007 and 2009, the New York State Supreme Court dismissed all of Mr. Trumps claims, and those decisions were affirmed by the Appellate Division. Mr. Trump cannot further appeal those decisions. In April 2010, Mr. Trump notified us of his intent to file a new suit claiming, among other things, that the limited partnerships should be dissolved. On April 29, 2010, we filed a motion for declaratory judgment in New York courts seeking to dispose of this claim.
In July 2005, we acquired H Street Building Corporation (H Street) which has a subsidiary that owns, among other things, a 50% tenancy in common interest in land located in Arlington County, Virginia, known as "Pentagon Row," leased to two tenants, Street Retail, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P . In April 2007, H Street acquired the remaining 50% interest in that fee. On September 25, 2008, both tenants filed suit against us and the former owners claiming the right of first offer to purchase the fee interest, damages in excess of $75,000,000 and punitive damages. On April 6, 2010, the Trial Court ruled, in favor of the tenants, that we sell the land to the tenants for a net sales price of $14,992,000, representing the Trial Courts allocation of our purchase price for H Street. The request for damages and punitive da mages was denied. We intend to appeal the Trial Courts decision and expect that the transfer of the land will be stayed pending the appeal. As a result of the Trial Courts decision, we have recorded a $10,056,000 loss accrual in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily representing previously recognized rental income.
56
There were no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In the first quarter of 2010, we issued 19,245 common shares upon the redemption of Class A units of the Operating Partnership held by persons who received units, in private placements in earlier periods, in exchange for their interests in limited partnerships that owned real estate. The common shares were issued without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on Section 4 (2) of that Act.
Information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under Part III, Item 12 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and such information is incorporated by reference herein.
None.
None.
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference and are listed in the attached Exhibit Index.
57
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
VORNADO REALTY TRUST |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 4, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Joseph Macnow |
|
|
Joseph Macnow, Executive Vice President - |
58
Exhibit No. |
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
- |
Articles of Restatement of Vornado Realty Trust, as filed with the State |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
- |
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Vornado Realty Trust, as amended on March 2, 2000 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
- |
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Vornado Realty L.P., |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
- |
Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of December 16, 1997 Incorporated by |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
- |
Second Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of April 1, 1998 Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
- |
Third Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of November 12, 1998 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
- |
Fourth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of November 30, 1998 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
- |
Fifth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of March 3, 1999 - Incorporated by |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
- |
Sixth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of March 17, 1999 - Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
- |
Seventh Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of May 20, 1999 - Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
- |
Eighth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of May 27, 1999 - Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.12 |
|
- |
Ninth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of September 3, 1999 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
- |
Tenth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of September 3, 1999 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________ |
|
59
3.14 |
|
- |
Eleventh Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of November 24, 1999 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
- |
Twelfth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2000 - Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
- |
Thirteenth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2000 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.17 |
|
- |
Fourteenth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2000 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
- |
Fifteenth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2000 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
- |
Sixteenth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2001 - Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.20 |
|
- |
Seventeenth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2001 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
- |
Eighteenth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2002 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
- |
Nineteenth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2002 - Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.23 |
|
- |
Twentieth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated April 9, 2003 - Incorporated by |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
- |
Twenty-First Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2003 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
- |
Twenty-Second Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2003 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
- |
Twenty-Third Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated May 27, 2004 Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
- |
Twenty-Fourth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated August 17, 2004 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________ |
|
60
3.28 |
|
- |
Twenty-Fifth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated November 17, 2004 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
- |
Twenty-Sixth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated December 17, 2004 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
- |
Twenty-Seventh Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated December 20, 2004 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
- |
Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated December 30, 2004 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
- |
Twenty-Ninth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated June 17, 2005 - Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.33 |
|
- |
Thirtieth Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated August 31, 2005 - Incorporated by |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
- |
Thirty-First Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, dated September 9, 2005 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
- |
Thirty-Second Amendment and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated as of |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
- |
Thirty-Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
- |
Thirty-Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
- |
Thirty-Fifth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
- |
Thirty-Sixth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
- |
Thirty-Seventh Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________ |
|
61
3.41 |
|
- |
Thirty-Eighth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.42 |
|
- |
Thirty-Ninth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
- |
Fortieth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
- |
Forty-First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
- |
Indenture, dated as of June 24, 2002, between Vornado Realty L.P. and The Bank of New |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
- |
Indenture, dated as of November 25, 2003, between Vornado Realty L.P. and The Bank of |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
- |
Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2006, among Vornado Realty Trust, as Issuer, Vornado |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of Vornado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
- |
Master Agreement and Guaranty, between Vornado, Inc. and Bradlees New Jersey, Inc. dated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
- |
Registration Rights Agreement between Vornado, Inc. and Steven Roth, dated December 29, |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
- |
Stock Pledge Agreement between Vornado, Inc. and Steven Roth dated December 29, 1992 - |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
** |
- |
Management Agreement between Interstate Properties and Vornado, Inc. dated July 13, 1992 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________ |
|
62
10.5 |
** |
- |
Employment Agreement, dated as of April 15, 1997, by and among Vornado Realty Trust, |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
** |
- |
Promissory Note from Steven Roth to Vornado Realty Trust, dated December 23, 2005 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
** |
- |
Letter agreement, dated November 16, 1999, between Steven Roth and Vornado Realty Trust |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
- |
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 18, 2001, by and among Vornado Realty |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
- |
Tax Reporting and Protection Agreement, dated December 31, 2001, by and among Vornado, |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
- |
Employment Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and Michael D. Fascitelli, dated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
** |
- |
First Amendment, dated October 31, 2002, to the Employment Agreement between Vornado |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
** |
- |
Amendment to Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2002, by and between |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
- |
59th Street Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2002, by and between |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
- |
Amended and Restated Management and Development Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2002, |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
- |
59th Street Management and Development Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2002, by and |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________ |
|
63
10.16 |
|
- |
Amendment dated May 29, 2002, to the Stock Pledge Agreement between Vornado Realty |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
** |
- |
Vornado Realty Trusts 2002 Omnibus Share Plan - Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
** |
- |
Form of Stock Option Agreement between the Company and certain employees |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
** |
- |
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and certain employees |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
** |
- |
Amendment, dated March 17, 2006, to the Vornado Realty Trust Omnibus Share Plan |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
** |
- |
Form of Vornado Realty Trust 2006 Out-Performance Plan Award Agreement, dated as of |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
** |
- |
Form of Vornado Realty Trust 2002 Restricted LTIP Unit Agreement Incorporated by |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
** |
- |
Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2006, among the Operating Partnership, |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
** |
- |
Amendment No.2, dated May 18, 2006, to the Vornado Realty Trust Omnibus Share Plan |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
** |
- |
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and Joseph |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
- |
Guaranty, made as of June 28, 2006, by Vornado Realty Trust, for the benefit of JP Morgan |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________ |
|
64
10.27 |
** |
- |
Amendment, dated October 26, 2006, to the Vornado Realty Trust Omnibus Share Plan |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
** |
- |
Amendment to Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated January 1, 2007, by and between |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.29 |
** |
- |
Amendment to 59th Street Real Estate Retention Agreement, dated January 1, 2007, by and |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
** |
- |
Employment Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and Mitchell Schear, as of April 19, |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
- |
Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2007, among Vornado Realty L.P. as |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
- |
Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2007, by and |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.33 |
** |
- |
Form of Vornado Realty Trust 2002 Omnibus Share Plan Non-Employee Trustee Restricted |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.34 |
** |
- |
Form of Vornado Realty Trust 2008 Out-Performance Plan Award Agreement Incorporated |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.35 |
** |
- |
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and Michael D. |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.36 |
** |
- |
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and Joseph Macnow, |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________ |
|
65
10.37 |
** |
- |
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and David R. |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.38 |
** |
- |
Amendment to Indemnification Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and David R. |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.39 |
** |
- |
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and Mitchell N. |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.40 |
** |
- |
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Vornado Realty Trust and Christopher G. |
* |
15.1 |
|
- |
Letter regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
- |
Rule 13a-14 (a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
- |
Rule 13a-14 (a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
- |
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
- |
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
- |
The following financial information from Vornado Realty Trusts Quarterly Report on Form |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________ |
|
66
EXHIBIT 15.1
May 4, 2010
Vornado Realty Trust
New York, New York
We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Vornado Realty Trust for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, as indicated in our report dated May 4, 2010; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, is incorporated by reference in the following registration statements of Vornado Realty Trust:
Registration Statement No. 333-68462 on Form S-8
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-36080 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-64015 on Form S-3
Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-50095 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-52573 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-29011 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-09159 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-76327 on Form S-3
Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-89667 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-81497 on Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-102216 on Form S-8
Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-102215 on Form S-3
Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-102217 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-105838 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-107024 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-109661 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-114146 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-114807 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-121929 on Form S-3
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-120384 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-126963 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-139646 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-141162 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-150592 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-150593 on Form S-8
and in the following joint registration statements of Vornado Realty Trust and Vornado Realty L.P.:
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-40787 on Form S-3
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-29013 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-108138 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-122306 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-138367 on Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-162775 on Form S-3
We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
I, Michael D. Fascitelli, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vornado Realty Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
May 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
Michael D. Fascitelli |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
I, Joseph Macnow, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vornado Realty Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
May 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
Joseph Macnow |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty Trust (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
| ||
May 4, 2010 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Name: |
Michael D. Fascitelli | |
|
|
Title: |
President and Chief Executive Officer | |
CERTIFICATION
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty Trust (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Name: |
Joseph Macnow | |
|
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President and | |